Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify iozone call and also measure sequential reads #12

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2024

Conversation

ThomasKaiser
Copy link
Contributor

Execution time slightly increases but this will allow in the future to get a bigger picture about the difference the fio measurement with 4 concurrent jobs (quite unrealistic for anything anyone will be doing ever on an SBC) and one single job makes especially in situations where cpufreq governors are used that will quickly ramp up CPU clockspeeds with 4 jobs in parallel but remain on low clockspeeds with iozone (and real-world workloads).

The | cut -c7-78 | tail -n6 | head -n4 can be deleted if the whole iozone output is wanted and not just the results in proper Markdown format.

Execution time slightly increases but this will allow in the future to get a bigger picture about the difference the fio measurement with 4 concurrent jobs (quite unrealistic for anything anyone will be doing ever on an SBC) and one single job makes especially in situations where cpufreq governors are used that will quickly ramp up CPU clockspeeds with 4 jobs in parallel but remain on low clockspeeds with iozone (and real-world workloads).
@geerlingguy geerlingguy merged commit da819bb into geerlingguy:master Apr 22, 2024
1 check passed
@geerlingguy
Copy link
Owner

I like seeing the live output, so I'll merge then drop the extra bits. I just like having it output while it's doing the test so I can verify things aren't locked up. I'm sure you know how often that can happen on some of the weaker boards :)

geerlingguy added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2024
@ThomasKaiser ThomasKaiser deleted the patch-1 branch April 23, 2024 08:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants