Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Address pending review comments from #8318 #8369

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Jan 27, 2023
Merged

Address pending review comments from #8318 #8369

merged 4 commits into from Jan 27, 2023

Conversation

raoanirudh
Copy link
Member

@raoanirudh raoanirudh commented Jan 27, 2023

Addresses the pending review comments from #8318. Part of #8317.

  • Add a comment about using only the first rupture proxy
  • Log also the standard deviation of the nominal bias
  • Explain all variables and notation used in the conditioned GMF calculator
  • Explain cmaker_Y and cmaker_D in the conditioned GMFs code

Whereas for a regular scenario gmf calculation, if the user requests 100
gmfs, the engine copies the same rupture 100 times before parallelizing
by rupture. However, for a conditioned gmf calculation for a scenario,
the conditioning process is computationally quite expensive, so we want
to avoid repeating it 100 times.
@raoanirudh raoanirudh added this to the Engine 3.16.0 milestone Jan 27, 2023
@raoanirudh raoanirudh self-assigned this Jan 27, 2023
@micheles
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, @raoanirudh

@micheles micheles merged commit 43b3268 into master Jan 27, 2023
@micheles micheles deleted the cgmfs branch January 27, 2023 13:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants