Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Activities of chaperone complex #13021

Closed
mcourtot opened this issue Feb 14, 2017 · 7 comments
Closed

Activities of chaperone complex #13021

mcourtot opened this issue Feb 14, 2017 · 7 comments

Comments

@mcourtot
Copy link
Contributor

A general chaperone complex term was created as requested by @bmeldal. However, in the ticket, @ValWood commented that there are other activities (in addition to "capable of GO:0044183 protein binding involved in protein folding") that chaperone complexes have.
We should review those and add them as needed, to ensure that other types of chaperone such as metallochaperones are inferred in the right place.

@tberardini
Copy link
Contributor

Who has the necessary expertise to address this missing info issue? Or do we need someone to dive into the chaperone literature?

@mcourtot
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll tag this as mini-project. At the moment things are not wrong, but they are I believe incomplete. In the original ticket, @paolaroncaglia mentioned that there has been a WG on chaperone in 2008-2009, and I'm hoping that people that were involved in those discussions ( @ValWood, @ukemi at least I suspect?) as well as @bmeldal who requested the chaperone complex term could have a look and comment/suggest updates.

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor

ValWood commented Feb 15, 2017

Agree this is none urgent. These chaperone flavour activities will be required eventually for LEGO modelling...maybe best to ignore until absolutely needed by an actual biological example...

@bmeldal
Copy link

bmeldal commented Feb 15, 2017

Thanks, and sorry for not commenting yesterday, I was on childcare duty in the afternoon and without wifi... (in the centre of Cambridge as well!)

@mcourtot can you please paste the stanza for chaperone complex as it's not in the ontology yet so I can't see it.

Chaperones are often involved in the transport of proteins or complexes to their functional site as well (effectively acting as guides). That would be a different activity altogether.
e.g. Mis18 complex:
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/intact/complex/details/EBI-9872194
A search for "chaperone" in the CP already comes up with 345 complexes, 121 of them human.

Birgit

@mcourtot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Here is the current stanza:
[Term]
id: GO:0101031
name: chaperone complex
namespace: cellular_component
def: "A protein complex required for the non-covalent folding or unfolding, maturation, stabilization or assembly or disassembly of macromolecular structures. Usually active during or immediately after completion of translation. Many chaperone complexes contain heat shock proteins." [GOC:bhm, PMID:21855797]
comment: An example of this is HSP90AB1 in human (P08238) in PMID:21855797 (inferred from direct assay).
is_a: GO:0043234 ! protein complex
relationship: capable_of GO:0044183 ! protein binding involved in protein folding

@bmeldal
Copy link

bmeldal commented Feb 15, 2017

Thanks, Melanie.
Yes, not incorrect but probably incomplete.

@ukemi ukemi self-assigned this Feb 23, 2017
@ukemi ukemi moved this from Ontology meeting TBD to Ontology call March 9th 2017 in ontology weekly meetings Mar 7, 2017
@ukemi
Copy link
Contributor

ukemi commented Mar 22, 2017

I'm going to close this one. Although it is true that the relations are probably incomplete, I think making models in Noctua will specify which other processes we need to link to this complex. The problem with chaperones is just as was described here. Things called chaperones can execute their function in many different biological contexts. That is why we originally had issues with the term as a molecular function. We cleaned this up by stating the activity explicitly. If we can think of specific processes to add, we can open tickets with those specific requests.

@ukemi ukemi closed this as completed Mar 22, 2017
@ukemi ukemi moved this from Ontology call March 16th 2017 to Done in ontology weekly meetings Mar 23, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants