You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
During applying RHEAs in bulk we came across problems mapping to terms in GO that have "NAD(P) in their defs. RHEA only does NAD or separate term NADP.
We know of 35 instances either already in GO with RHEA, or just added with our bulk addition that have NAD(P) in def. total RHEA NAD(P).txt
There are 15 in the bulk set. i will work on these as I can. Essentially any NAD(P) term should have two children with two separate RHEAs. Rhea automapped to NAD(P)s.txt
See this pull request
Add proposed RHEA mappings which have no logical conflicts. #19609
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
During applying RHEAs in bulk we came across problems mapping to terms in GO that have "NAD(P) in their defs. RHEA only does NAD or separate term NADP.
We know of 35 instances either already in GO with RHEA, or just added with our bulk addition that have NAD(P) in def.
total RHEA NAD(P).txt
There are 15 in the bulk set. i will work on these as I can. Essentially any NAD(P) term should have two children with two separate RHEAs.
Rhea automapped to NAD(P)s.txt
See this pull request
Add proposed RHEA mappings which have no logical conflicts. #19609
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: