Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discuss the right approach to dealing with GOA tRNA increase #1185

Closed
kltm opened this issue Sep 26, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Discuss the right approach to dealing with GOA tRNA increase #1185

kltm opened this issue Sep 26, 2019 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@kltm
Copy link
Member

kltm commented Sep 26, 2019

For ongoing discussion, as we are putting in measures to bypass the immediate problems #1168 .

From my memory, due to the spike in IEA tRNA annotations available in GOA , it was decided to reach out to them and see if we could get two versions, IEA and non-IEA, the latter of which we now consume.

There is a question as to whether this is a good long-term solution and that perhaps this should be fixed in a more systematic way upstream.

Tagging @pgaudet @cmungall

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Sep 30, 2019

This is the correct solution until RNA central provides the equivalent of a Reference Proteome version of RNAs- right now they include ALL sequenced RNAs, so probably many redundant sequences.

What is the action here ?

Thanks, Pascale

@kltm
Copy link
Member Author

kltm commented Sep 30, 2019

This is a placeholder for the moment for you (@pgaudet ) to start a conversation with @cmungall about a long-term solution.

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Sep 30, 2019

@thomaspd was going to ask colleagues at the EBI.

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Jul 15, 2024

Duplicate of #1168

Now that we load the 'GOA-plus' files this is not an issue anymore.

@pgaudet pgaudet closed this as completed Jul 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants