EBI-GOA to generate since GAF & GPAD & GPI files for each species

[pgaudet]

Hello,

Right now we have 4 files for several species (human chicken cow pig dog), which was requested here #156 (with little explanation as to why we anted that).

1. annotations to canonical accessions from the UniProt reference proteome
2. annotations to isoforms from the UniProt reference proteome
3. annotations to complexes
4. annotations to RNAs

• @alexsign will generate a single file for those species.

• we will also need to update the GOA yaml file

Thanks, Pascale

[kltm]

In discussion with @pgaudet , we'll try switching over to this after next successful release and @pgaudet is back online.

[cmungall]

To clarify: this only applies to GAFs where there does not exist a MOD that assigns gene IDs.

For a MOD like dictyBase, even though the GAFs are currently managed at EBI-GOA, we just want a traditional GAF, the quad distinction (isoform, complex, etc) is only relevant when UniProt IDs are the primary IDs

This is the current dicty file which is what we want

curl -L -s ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/contrib/goa/dictyBase.gaf.gz | gzip -dc | grep -c ^dictyBase
79736

The GAFs that are here are uniprot ID-based:
https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/contrib/goa/grcp_plus_test/

We shouldn't consume or promote the MOD ones (dicty, zfin, etc) as this will lead to confusing.

Of course we still want the consolidates ones for human, cow, etc

[cmungall]

Updating this issue to clarify what the actual requirements are for human, etc.

• for protein coding genes, GCRP-only this is important; i.e not "2" in the list above
• for RNAs, RNA central IDs
• for complexes, complex portal

The so-called isoform file should not be included as this confuses things, messes up counts for enrichment etc.

This is in fact the contents of the files at https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/contrib/goa/grcp_plus_test/, as indicated in the header:

!The set of protein accessions included in this file is based on UniProt reference proteomes, which provide one protein per gene.
!They include the protein sequences annotated in Swiss-Prot or the longest TrEMBL transcript if there is no Swiss-Prot record.
!In addition this file included Swiss-Prot Isoforms, RNA and ComplexPortal annotations data

This is all good, but it is important to precisely clarify requirements / spec in the issue

But my previous point still stands, for dicty we want gene IDs

[pgaudet]

@cmungall

Why dont we want annotations to isoforms? we are missing a lot of annotations because we exclude these.