You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The basic idea here is that when a relationship exists between terms in the ontology, e.g. MF part_of BP, then if there are manual annotations to both (and either no extensions or extensions are all the same), then those annotations could be connected during the import.
We need some illustrative examples here, so holding off on adding this to the to-do list just yet.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We would get the construct at the far left of the model:gomodel:bfa1a7ae-0c5e-418b-a172-e5d1773414f2 because fibroblast growth factor-activated receptor activity is part_of fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling pathway and has_part some fibroblast growth factor binding. The last relation between functions would have no evidence at this point in time.
The basic idea here is that when a relationship exists between terms in the ontology, e.g. MF part_of BP, then if there are manual annotations to both (and either no extensions or extensions are all the same), then those annotations could be connected during the import.
We need some illustrative examples here, so holding off on adding this to the to-do list just yet.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: