Establish a methdology to gather and select papers

[fergunet]

A possible example:

0. Define concepts: UNCERTAINTY vs DYNAMISM etc... This has to be done BEFORE any search, hence step 0 instead 1
1. Define a Scopus search. Example TITLE-ABS-KEY ( uncertainty AND optimization ) AND ( LIMIT-TO ( SUBJAREA , "COMP" ) ) (althought I think it is still a bit limited, any suggestions to improve it?)
2. Filter according previously defined concepts, and other decisions (date? number of citations?)
3. Show data (by year, by type of publication, real problem or not, topic...)

This methodology should be explained in the paper as a complete section. Next section would be the one to include the classification/taxonomy and discussion.

[JJ]

2018-01-19 16:02 GMT+01:00 Pablo García Sánchez <notifications@github.com>:

A possible example: 1. Define concepts: UNCERTAINTY vs DYNAMISM etc... This has to be done BEFORE any search, hence step 0 instead 1 2. Define a Scopus search. Example TITLE-ABS-KEY ( uncertainty AND optimization ) AND ( LIMIT-TO ( SUBJAREA , "COMP" ) ) (althought I think it is still a bit limited, any suggestions to improve it?) 3. Filter according previously defined concepts, and other decisions (date? number of citations?) 4. Show data (by year, by type of publication, real problem or not, topic...) This methodology should be explained in the paper as a complete section. Next section would be the one to include the classification/taxonomy and discussion.

This is more a bibliometrics thing and I don't know very well what to do. I have been reading the survey paper this morning and the problem is that it's ill-defined what we mean by uncertainty, being reduced to a "crisp" function with added noise. So anyway Concepts would be "noisy" "uncertainty" "optimization" "evolutionary computation" (and other related areas) and so on...

[fergunet]

These guys did it [1] for the journal, and we can also adapt its structure (in fact, I realized they also did the stuff I suggested in #8)

[1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568494617301278

[fergunet]

Dammit, using WoS with the query TS=((evolutionary algorithm OR genetic algorithm) AND (uncertainty OR noisy OR dynamic)) Refinado por: Dominios de investigación: ( SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY ) AND Áreas de investigación: ( COMPUTER SCIENCE ) gives me 20133 files D: Same with Scopus.

Any idea to refine the search or just keep these numbers to shown? (by year, by type...)

[JJ]

use quotes to find only that combination of words.

[fergunet]

We have a winner TITLE-ABS-KEY ( "noisy evolutionary algorithm" OR "noisy genetic algorithm" OR "dynamic evolutionary algorithm" OR "dynamic genetic algorithm" OR "dynamic fitness" OR "noisy fitness" ) AND ( LIMIT-TO ( SUBJAREA , "COMP " ) ) I will upload the csv with all these references right away.

[fergunet]

Can somebody else execute the query above in Scopus and export a CSV including Abstracts and Keywords? If I add in the Keywords/Abstracts in the export wizard it doesn't generate anything :S (tested in Ubuntu and MacOS with Firefox and Chrome)

[JJ]

I don't think it's got anything to do with the OS...

[fergunet]

I know, it was a preventive declaration before somebody said “use linux and not posh OSes” ;) El El mar, 20 feb 2018 a las 21:12, Juan Julián Merelo Guervós < notifications@github.com> escribió:

I don't think it's got anything to do with the OS... — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#6 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC6kMjoFu9rek5Jkr1sUbOMx5Hq3HE4Sks5tWyTegaJpZM4RkmNS> .

-- Dr. Pablo García Sánchez University of Cádiz

[JJ]

¿Esto es Web of Science o Scopus?

[fergunet]

Scopus