New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Entrypoint::wait_and_dispatch_one_io_signal() must be solely called by the entrypoint thread #2399
Comments
chelmuth
added a commit
to chelmuth/genode
that referenced
this issue
May 2, 2017
alex-ab
added a commit
to alex-ab/genode
that referenced
this issue
Aug 8, 2017
nfeske
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 9, 2017
cproc
added a commit
to cproc/genode
that referenced
this issue
Aug 10, 2017
The VFS library can be used in single-threaded or multi-threaded environments and depending on that, signals are handled by the same thread which uses the VFS library or possibly by a different thread. If a VFS plugin needs to block to wait for a signal, there is currently no way which works reliably in both environments. For this reason, this commit makes the interface of the VFS library nonblocking, similar to the File_system session interface. The most important changes are: - Directories are created and opened with the 'opendir()' function and the directory entries are read with the recently introduced 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions. - Symbolic links are created and opened with the 'openlink()' function and the link target is read with the 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions and written with the 'write()' function. - The 'write()' function does not wait for signals anymore. This can have the effect that data written by a VFS library user has not been processed by a file system server yet when the library user asks for the size of the file or closes it (both done with RPC functions at the file system server). For this reason, a user of the VFS library should request synchronization before calling 'stat()' or 'close()'. To make sure that a file system server has processed all write request packets which a client submitted before the synchronization request, synchronization is now requested at the file system server with a synchronization packet instead of an RPC function. Because of this change, the synchronization interface of the VFS library is now split into 'queue_sync()' and 'complete_sync()' functions. Fixes genodelabs#2399
cproc
added a commit
to cproc/genode
that referenced
this issue
Aug 14, 2017
The VFS library can be used in single-threaded or multi-threaded environments and depending on that, signals are handled by the same thread which uses the VFS library or possibly by a different thread. If a VFS plugin needs to block to wait for a signal, there is currently no way which works reliably in both environments. For this reason, this commit makes the interface of the VFS library nonblocking, similar to the File_system session interface. The most important changes are: - Directories are created and opened with the 'opendir()' function and the directory entries are read with the recently introduced 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions. - Symbolic links are created and opened with the 'openlink()' function and the link target is read with the 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions and written with the 'write()' function. - The 'write()' function does not wait for signals anymore. This can have the effect that data written by a VFS library user has not been processed by a file system server yet when the library user asks for the size of the file or closes it (both done with RPC functions at the file system server). For this reason, a user of the VFS library should request synchronization before calling 'stat()' or 'close()'. To make sure that a file system server has processed all write request packets which a client submitted before the synchronization request, synchronization is now requested at the file system server with a synchronization packet instead of an RPC function. Because of this change, the synchronization interface of the VFS library is now split into 'queue_sync()' and 'complete_sync()' functions. Fixes genodelabs#2399
cproc
added a commit
to cproc/genode
that referenced
this issue
Aug 14, 2017
The VFS library can be used in single-threaded or multi-threaded environments and depending on that, signals are handled by the same thread which uses the VFS library or possibly by a different thread. If a VFS plugin needs to block to wait for a signal, there is currently no way which works reliably in both environments. For this reason, this commit makes the interface of the VFS library nonblocking, similar to the File_system session interface. The most important changes are: - Directories are created and opened with the 'opendir()' function and the directory entries are read with the recently introduced 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions. - Symbolic links are created and opened with the 'openlink()' function and the link target is read with the 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions and written with the 'write()' function. - The 'write()' function does not wait for signals anymore. This can have the effect that data written by a VFS library user has not been processed by a file system server yet when the library user asks for the size of the file or closes it (both done with RPC functions at the file system server). For this reason, a user of the VFS library should request synchronization before calling 'stat()' or 'close()'. To make sure that a file system server has processed all write request packets which a client submitted before the synchronization request, synchronization is now requested at the file system server with a synchronization packet instead of an RPC function. Because of this change, the synchronization interface of the VFS library is now split into 'queue_sync()' and 'complete_sync()' functions. Fixes genodelabs#2399
cproc
added a commit
to cproc/genode
that referenced
this issue
Aug 15, 2017
The VFS library can be used in single-threaded or multi-threaded environments and depending on that, signals are handled by the same thread which uses the VFS library or possibly by a different thread. If a VFS plugin needs to block to wait for a signal, there is currently no way which works reliably in both environments. For this reason, this commit makes the interface of the VFS library nonblocking, similar to the File_system session interface. The most important changes are: - Directories are created and opened with the 'opendir()' function and the directory entries are read with the recently introduced 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions. - Symbolic links are created and opened with the 'openlink()' function and the link target is read with the 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions and written with the 'write()' function. - The 'write()' function does not wait for signals anymore. This can have the effect that data written by a VFS library user has not been processed by a file system server yet when the library user asks for the size of the file or closes it (both done with RPC functions at the file system server). For this reason, a user of the VFS library should request synchronization before calling 'stat()' or 'close()'. To make sure that a file system server has processed all write request packets which a client submitted before the synchronization request, synchronization is now requested at the file system server with a synchronization packet instead of an RPC function. Because of this change, the synchronization interface of the VFS library is now split into 'queue_sync()' and 'complete_sync()' functions. Fixes genodelabs#2399
cproc
added a commit
to cproc/genode
that referenced
this issue
Aug 15, 2017
The VFS library can be used in single-threaded or multi-threaded environments and depending on that, signals are handled by the same thread which uses the VFS library or possibly by a different thread. If a VFS plugin needs to block to wait for a signal, there is currently no way which works reliably in both environments. For this reason, this commit makes the interface of the VFS library nonblocking, similar to the File_system session interface. The most important changes are: - Directories are created and opened with the 'opendir()' function and the directory entries are read with the recently introduced 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions. - Symbolic links are created and opened with the 'openlink()' function and the link target is read with the 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions and written with the 'write()' function. - The 'write()' function does not wait for signals anymore. This can have the effect that data written by a VFS library user has not been processed by a file system server yet when the library user asks for the size of the file or closes it (both done with RPC functions at the file system server). For this reason, a user of the VFS library should request synchronization before calling 'stat()' or 'close()'. To make sure that a file system server has processed all write request packets which a client submitted before the synchronization request, synchronization is now requested at the file system server with a synchronization packet instead of an RPC function. Because of this change, the synchronization interface of the VFS library is now split into 'queue_sync()' and 'complete_sync()' functions. Fixes genodelabs#2399
cproc
added a commit
to cproc/genode
that referenced
this issue
Aug 15, 2017
The VFS library can be used in single-threaded or multi-threaded environments and depending on that, signals are handled by the same thread which uses the VFS library or possibly by a different thread. If a VFS plugin needs to block to wait for a signal, there is currently no way which works reliably in both environments. For this reason, this commit makes the interface of the VFS library nonblocking, similar to the File_system session interface. The most important changes are: - Directories are created and opened with the 'opendir()' function and the directory entries are read with the recently introduced 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions. - Symbolic links are created and opened with the 'openlink()' function and the link target is read with the 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions and written with the 'write()' function. - The 'write()' function does not wait for signals anymore. This can have the effect that data written by a VFS library user has not been processed by a file system server yet when the library user asks for the size of the file or closes it (both done with RPC functions at the file system server). For this reason, a user of the VFS library should request synchronization before calling 'stat()' or 'close()'. To make sure that a file system server has processed all write request packets which a client submitted before the synchronization request, synchronization is now requested at the file system server with a synchronization packet instead of an RPC function. Because of this change, the synchronization interface of the VFS library is now split into 'queue_sync()' and 'complete_sync()' functions. Fixes genodelabs#2399
cproc
added a commit
to cproc/genode
that referenced
this issue
Aug 15, 2017
The VFS library can be used in single-threaded or multi-threaded environments and depending on that, signals are handled by the same thread which uses the VFS library or possibly by a different thread. If a VFS plugin needs to block to wait for a signal, there is currently no way which works reliably in both environments. For this reason, this commit makes the interface of the VFS library nonblocking, similar to the File_system session interface. The most important changes are: - Directories are created and opened with the 'opendir()' function and the directory entries are read with the recently introduced 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions. - Symbolic links are created and opened with the 'openlink()' function and the link target is read with the 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions and written with the 'write()' function. - The 'write()' function does not wait for signals anymore. This can have the effect that data written by a VFS library user has not been processed by a file system server yet when the library user asks for the size of the file or closes it (both done with RPC functions at the file system server). For this reason, a user of the VFS library should request synchronization before calling 'stat()' or 'close()'. To make sure that a file system server has processed all write request packets which a client submitted before the synchronization request, synchronization is now requested at the file system server with a synchronization packet instead of an RPC function. Because of this change, the synchronization interface of the VFS library is now split into 'queue_sync()' and 'complete_sync()' functions. Fixes genodelabs#2399
chelmuth
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 17, 2017
chelmuth
pushed a commit
to chelmuth/genode
that referenced
this issue
Aug 17, 2017
The VFS library can be used in single-threaded or multi-threaded environments and depending on that, signals are handled by the same thread which uses the VFS library or possibly by a different thread. If a VFS plugin needs to block to wait for a signal, there is currently no way which works reliably in both environments. For this reason, this commit makes the interface of the VFS library nonblocking, similar to the File_system session interface. The most important changes are: - Directories are created and opened with the 'opendir()' function and the directory entries are read with the recently introduced 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions. - Symbolic links are created and opened with the 'openlink()' function and the link target is read with the 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions and written with the 'write()' function. - The 'write()' function does not wait for signals anymore. This can have the effect that data written by a VFS library user has not been processed by a file system server yet when the library user asks for the size of the file or closes it (both done with RPC functions at the file system server). For this reason, a user of the VFS library should request synchronization before calling 'stat()' or 'close()'. To make sure that a file system server has processed all write request packets which a client submitted before the synchronization request, synchronization is now requested at the file system server with a synchronization packet instead of an RPC function. Because of this change, the synchronization interface of the VFS library is now split into 'queue_sync()' and 'complete_sync()' functions. Fixes genodelabs#2399
cproc
added a commit
to cproc/genode
that referenced
this issue
Aug 17, 2017
chelmuth
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 18, 2017
chelmuth
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 18, 2017
The VFS library can be used in single-threaded or multi-threaded environments and depending on that, signals are handled by the same thread which uses the VFS library or possibly by a different thread. If a VFS plugin needs to block to wait for a signal, there is currently no way which works reliably in both environments. For this reason, this commit makes the interface of the VFS library nonblocking, similar to the File_system session interface. The most important changes are: - Directories are created and opened with the 'opendir()' function and the directory entries are read with the recently introduced 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions. - Symbolic links are created and opened with the 'openlink()' function and the link target is read with the 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions and written with the 'write()' function. - The 'write()' function does not wait for signals anymore. This can have the effect that data written by a VFS library user has not been processed by a file system server yet when the library user asks for the size of the file or closes it (both done with RPC functions at the file system server). For this reason, a user of the VFS library should request synchronization before calling 'stat()' or 'close()'. To make sure that a file system server has processed all write request packets which a client submitted before the synchronization request, synchronization is now requested at the file system server with a synchronization packet instead of an RPC function. Because of this change, the synchronization interface of the VFS library is now split into 'queue_sync()' and 'complete_sync()' functions. Fixes #2399
chelmuth
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 18, 2017
cproc
added a commit
to cproc/genode
that referenced
this issue
Aug 20, 2017
chelmuth
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 21, 2017
cproc
added a commit
to cproc/genode
that referenced
this issue
Aug 21, 2017
cproc
added a commit
to cproc/genode
that referenced
this issue
Aug 21, 2017
chelmuth
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 21, 2017
chelmuth
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 21, 2017
cproc
added a commit
to cproc/genode
that referenced
this issue
Aug 22, 2017
chelmuth
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 22, 2017
chelmuth
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 23, 2017
The VFS library can be used in single-threaded or multi-threaded environments and depending on that, signals are handled by the same thread which uses the VFS library or possibly by a different thread. If a VFS plugin needs to block to wait for a signal, there is currently no way which works reliably in both environments. For this reason, this commit makes the interface of the VFS library nonblocking, similar to the File_system session interface. The most important changes are: - Directories are created and opened with the 'opendir()' function and the directory entries are read with the recently introduced 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions. - Symbolic links are created and opened with the 'openlink()' function and the link target is read with the 'queue_read()' and 'complete_read()' functions and written with the 'write()' function. - The 'write()' function does not wait for signals anymore. This can have the effect that data written by a VFS library user has not been processed by a file system server yet when the library user asks for the size of the file or closes it (both done with RPC functions at the file system server). For this reason, a user of the VFS library should request synchronization before calling 'stat()' or 'close()'. To make sure that a file system server has processed all write request packets which a client submitted before the synchronization request, synchronization is now requested at the file system server with a synchronization packet instead of an RPC function. Because of this change, the synchronization interface of the VFS library is now split into 'queue_sync()' and 'complete_sync()' functions. Fixes #2399
chelmuth
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 4, 2019
chelmuth
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 11, 2019
chelmuth
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 13, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
which is not the case everywhere (e.g. fs_file_system.h).
If a thread, e.g. a pthread of vbox on hw/muen, issues write requests, the pthread may wait for the acknowledgements of the write requests.
If the pthread has to wait, it calls
ep().wait_and_dispatch_one_io_signal()
. It will never return respectively wakeup, since the internal implementation will send the wakup to the entrypoint and not to the pthread (seerepos/base-hw/src/lib/base/signal.cc Signal_receiver::unblock_signal_waiter()
).The generic implementation plays a bit better for the other platforms, e.g. vbox on nova (
repos/base/src/lib/base/signal.cc Signal_receiver::unblock_signal_waiter()
). There a Genode semaphore is used to block and unblock threads, so that the right thread will be woken up. That explains why vbox on nova still performs ok.Nevertheless,
Entrypoint::wait_and_dispatch_one_signal()
inrepos/base/src/lib/base/entrypoint.cc
, will fail to work as soon as the entrypoint and several pthreads callwait_and_dispatch_one_signal()
concurrently.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: