You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
``Hello,
As you know with the current situation of the red sea crisis, most of the vessels are passing through the cape of good hope instead of taking the babalmandab region . My problem is concerning routes for origin/destination ports such as Singapore and Jeddah , where the vessels are passing through the cape of good hope then suez canal to meet the port call Jeddah. However, with the current argument in the route calculation function the restriction for 'babalmandab' does not seem to have any effect as I still get the route that passes through this region ( babalmandab ) .
Hi @Niloufar375,
This was obviously a bug in the marnet network which had a hidden connected line on top of "babalmandab" passage, now it's fixed and will be visible in version 1.4.0 from pypi.
``Hello,
As you know with the current situation of the red sea crisis, most of the vessels are passing through the cape of good hope instead of taking the babalmandab region . My problem is concerning routes for origin/destination ports such as Singapore and Jeddah , where the vessels are passing through the cape of good hope then suez canal to meet the port call Jeddah. However, with the current argument in the route calculation function the restriction for 'babalmandab' does not seem to have any effect as I still get the route that passes through this region ( babalmandab ) .
route = sr.searoute(origin, destination,restrictions=['babalmandab'])
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: