Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

net-analyzer/speedtest-cli - add setuptools dependency (bug# 502302) #11

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

net-analyzer/speedtest-cli - add setuptools dependency (bug# 502302) #11

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

mm1ke
Copy link

@mm1ke mm1ke commented Feb 10, 2015

This annoyed me for quite some time. Especially on minimal systems, were setuptools wasn't pulled by any other packages, i've hit this quite often. Would be nice if we could finally add this dependency.

Gentoo-Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502302
Btw, the bug is for Version 0.2.4, but it's still valid for 0.2.5 - just testet it + see duplicate.

Maybe this should also block: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=530994

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Copyright 1999-2015 Gentoo Foundation
# Copyright 1998-2015 Gentoo Foundation
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please don't move copyright back :).

@mgorny
Copy link
Member

mgorny commented Feb 10, 2015

Please fix the copyright year and then I'll merge it.

@mgorny
Copy link
Member

mgorny commented Feb 10, 2015

Merged.

Now a quick extra lesson: in trivial-yet-important fixes like this, you may consider adding them to older stable version too. I just did that after confirming it uses setuptools as way. While you generally should be extra cautious when dealing with stable ebuilds, adding extra DEPEND to unbreak them is rather fine :).

@mgorny mgorny closed this Feb 10, 2015
@mm1ke mm1ke deleted the bug_#502302 branch February 12, 2015 20:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants