Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not link NO_COLOR to isatty or TERM #1189

Commits on Nov 26, 2023

  1. Do not link NO_COLOR to isatty or TERM

    Do not link NO_COLOR to isatty or TERM, in order to allow
    more explicit control. Also do not foce NO_COLOR for
    background jobs in AbstractEbuildProcess.
    
    The link between NO_COLOR and the --color option is currently
    preserved, though it could be useful to decouple them, since
    the user may want to set NO_COLOR just for ebuild processes
    while keeping color enabled in the portage UI. However, this
    would drastically change the result of having NO_COLOR set
    to true in make.conf, so they remain coupled for now.
    
    Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/918515
    Signed-off-by: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org>
    zmedico committed Nov 26, 2023
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    9b9bd6e View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history