-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 233
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update continental extension cookbook #1837
Update continental extension cookbook #1837
Conversation
/run-tests |
Seems reasonable. Interesting that the results change quite a bit although the value should be the same. Do you have an explanation for that? |
@gassmoeller -Are you looking at the differences between the high resolution images (strain rate at 10 Myr snapshot)? The shear band patterns and system overall starts evolving quite quickly once extension gets going. With the slightly higher geotherm, the system is simply at a different "state" and due to the non-linearity things change quickly. Honestly, I'm surprised it did not change more. Running the same setup with different codes (similar methods) but nearly identical initial conditions sometimes gives noticeably different results. I guess "the results change quite a bit" is somewhat up to interpretation. Working on trying to quantifying these types of changes at the moment :) |
I guess my question was: Why are we at a slightly higher geotherm, if the radioactive heating before and now are the same (1.e5e-6 W/m^3)? |
doc/manual/manual.tex
Outdated
@@ -7945,17 +7945,17 @@ \subsubsection{Continental extension} | |||
\begin{figure} | |||
\centering | |||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{cookbooks/continental_extension/continental_extension_cookbook_strainrate_5e6yr.png} | |||
\caption{\it Strain rate ($s^{-1}$) after 5e6 years of extension. The black line marks the 500 $^{o}C$ isotherm.} | |||
\caption{\it Strain rate ($s^{-1}$) after 5e6 years of extension. The black line marks the 550 $^{o}C$ isotherm.} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While you're there, can you change this to $550^\circ$C
? That creates the proper "degree" symbol. Same for the other figures below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
Ah, sorry for the confusion. The radioactive heating before was not correct as the the initial concentration should have been 1e6 instead of 1 |
Now it makes sense 😄. Ready to merge when Wolfgang's comment is addressed. |
A few changes to the continental extension cookbook to fix the error in the radiogenic heating term (switched to compositional heating model) and a few additional minor parameter file adjustments.