BUG: avoid warning from deprecated explode in clip() #2179
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
geopandas/tools/clip.py
Outdated
| @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ def clip(gdf, mask, keep_geom_type=False): | |||
| elif new_collection or more_types: | |||
| orig_type = gdf.geom_type.iloc[0] | |||
| if new_collection: | |||
| clipped = clipped.explode() | |||
| clipped = clipped.explode(index_parts=True) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is the backwards compatible change, but, looking at this code now, we should actually set this to False? (we directly return this object, so which gets a MultiIndex in this case)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think that short-term this should be False to avoid MultiIndex, the long-term we should filter geom types and dissolve the result back as you mentioned in #1667 (comment).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
xref #1667 (comment)