use flag instead of for-else in csw:retrecords #919
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pvgenuchten
force-pushed
the
for_else_should_be_on_outer_loop
branch
from
402552e
to
68cb141
Compare
pvgenuchten
added a commit
to pvgenuchten/OWSLib
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2024
fix flake8 error
pvgenuchten
force-pushed
the
for_else_should_be_on_outer_loop
branch
from
68cb141
to
46c541d
Compare
pvgenuchten
added a commit
to pvgenuchten/OWSLib
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2024
tomkralidis
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
for-else works on break in outer loop only, so replace by flag on a xml-url being found
resolves #917