-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactoring vector
module for better maintainability and extensibility.
#371
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM overall, but I can't say for sure 😅.
One naming nit: should we use something like set
instead of binary
? And formats
(:bike: :house:) instead of text
?
Not a nit... I've already renamed those 5 times. 🙈 |
0f60449
to
b91d20f
Compare
Changes include: * Grouping methods of similar purpose into separate files * Putting associated tests in the same file as the implementation * Adding or expanding documentation on existing methods * Normalizing documentation patterns and format.
b91d20f
to
0ab98e0
Compare
@lnicola @jdroenner I'm going to merge this, and then in a separate PR implement |
✌️ metasim can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
Actually, maybe there's no breaking changes? bors r+ |
CHANGES.md
if knowledge of this change could be valuable to users.Refactoring to improve maintainability of vector module.
Changes include:
Intent was to not have any breaking changes.