Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE REQUEST] 1-year Transport Tracer benchmark #40

Closed
lizziel opened this issue Oct 15, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

[FEATURE REQUEST] 1-year Transport Tracer benchmark #40

lizziel opened this issue Oct 15, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
category: Feature Request New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@lizziel
Copy link
Contributor

lizziel commented Oct 15, 2019

The GEOS-Chem Transport Tracer benchmark code is currently written in IDL and stored at https://bitbucket.org/gcst/gc_1yr_rnpbbepasv_benchmark. The same functionality should be added to GCPy as needed to retire the dependency on IDL.

@yantosca
Copy link
Contributor

We have now modified GCPy so that you can create benchmark plots & budgets for either the full-chem or TransportTracers benchmarks.

NOTE: Right now the TransportTracers budget code has to be called separately but further modifications can make it be called from run_1yr_benchmark.py.

@yantosca yantosca self-assigned this Mar 31, 2020
@yantosca yantosca added this to the 0.2.0 milestone Mar 31, 2020
@yantosca
Copy link
Contributor

We now can plot the following output for the TransportTracersBenchmark:

GCC vs. GCC

  1. RnPbBe tracer concentrations
  2. Passive tracer concentrations
  3. WetLossConv rates (loss of soluble species in convection)
  4. WetLossLS rates (loss of soluble species in rainout/washout)
  5. Budgets of Pb210, Be7, Be10
  6. Budget diagnostics (change of mass after each operation)
  7. Strat-trop exchange of Rn, Pb, Be (flux of species from TPCORE across 100hPa)

GCHP vs. GCC

  1. RnPbBe tracer concentrations
  2. Passive tracer concentrations
  3. WetLossConv rates
  4. WetLossLS rates
  5. Budgets of Pb210, Be7, Be10
  6. Budget diagnostics

GCHP vs. GCHP

  1. RnPbBe tracer concentrations
  2. Passive tracer concentrations
  3. WetLossConv rates
  4. WetLossLS rates
  5. Budgets of Pb210, Be7, Be10
  6. Budget diagnostics

Therefore we can close out this issue. We may investigate how to obtain the strat-trop exchange from GCHP in the future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category: Feature Request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants