You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Could you update that, and double check that the code reflects those changes as well?
...
In terms of definitions it's not clear whether OPOA should be POA or SOA. As Jeff says, there are measurement reasons to lump OPOA with SOA, but there are source reasons to do the opposite. We mention this on page of 4 of Pai et al. 2020 where we decided to classify OPOA as POA rather than SOA, largely to be consistent with previous GEOS-Chem studies, especially Pye et al., 2010. You can also see this in Figure 1 of Pai et al. which describes the current complex and simple scheme implemented in GEOS-Chem. That figure is now up on the wiki for SOA: http://wiki.seas.harvard.edu/geos-chem/index.php/Secondary_organic_aerosols
Note that on the wiki link above, the removal of VBS isoprene SOA in v12.6.0 is also discussed. We will follow up with the Support Team to make sure that the PM2.5 calculation is similarly described (for the removal of VBS isoprene SOA).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We will add this as a patch in 12.9.2, as this will not affect the Standard or Benchmark simulations.
yantosca
changed the title
[FEATURE REQUEST] PM2.5 definintion for complex SOA is incorrect
[FEATURE REQUEST] Update incorrect PM2.5 definintion for complex SOA simulations
Jul 23, 2020
Maggie Marvin provided a fix that adds OPOA to the PM25 array
in aerosol_mod.F90 if OPOA is a defined species.
This commit resolves the issue described in:
#384
Signed-off-by: Bob Yantosca <yantosca@seas.harvard.edu>
Request a new GEOS-Chem feature
Colette Heald wrote:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: