Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE REQUEST] Update PM2.5 definition in GEOS-Chem #685

Closed
yantosca opened this issue Apr 8, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

[FEATURE REQUEST] Update PM2.5 definition in GEOS-Chem #685

yantosca opened this issue Apr 8, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
category: Feature Request New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@yantosca
Copy link
Contributor

yantosca commented Apr 8, 2021

The GEOS-Chem Aerosols Working Group have approved a new formulation for PM2.5, as described on the GEOS-Chem wiki: http://wiki.geos-chem.org/Particulate_matter_in_GEOS-Chem.

This will be added into a GEOS-Chem 13.Y.0 version (TBD)

@yantosca yantosca added the category: Feature Request New feature or request label Apr 8, 2021
@yantosca yantosca added this to the 13.1.0 milestone Apr 9, 2021
@msulprizio
Copy link
Contributor

We currently don't use hardcoded growth factors but rather compute the coefficients using the code highlighted here provided by Aaron van Donkelaar. We need guidance from the Aerosol WG on how to translate the new recommendations into the code.

@msulprizio msulprizio self-assigned this Apr 9, 2021
@msulprizio
Copy link
Contributor

Randall Martin wrote:

Aaron advised that all that is needed is to change a single line (391):

!Set SIA growth to half of its original value to treat as partially crystalline
SIA_GROWTH = SIA_GROWTH/2e+0_fp

@msulprizio
Copy link
Contributor

This update is now in the dev branch (commit ea23363) and will be included in GEOS-Chem 13.1.0.

@msulprizio
Copy link
Contributor

I ran a 1-hour test simulation with 13.1.0 with debug print out turned on to check the growth factor values computed in aerosol_mod.F90 using the code updates suggested by Aaron and we get:

Growth factors at 35% RH:
 0.62 for SO4, NIT, and NH4
 1.05 for OCPI and SOA
 1.86 for SALA

That doesn't match up with the 1.10 value recommended on the PM2.5 wiki page.

Randall Marting wrote:

For SIA Growth, it appears that two different definitions were being used (the value above 1, and the total value). I think the safest option is to replace the code with the following, which is another approach that Aaron recommended.

 !Set SIA growth above unity to half of its original value of 1.2 to treat as partially crystalline
 SIA_GROWTH = 1.1

@msulprizio msulprizio modified the milestones: 13.1.0, 13.1.1 Jun 15, 2021
msulprizio added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 21, 2021
…tially crystalline

The previous update in commit ea23363 did not properly set SIA_Growth to
1.10 as recommended. We now force SIA_GROWTH to that value. For more details
see #685.

Signed-off-by: Melissa Sulprizio <mpayer@seas.harvard.edu>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category: Feature Request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants