New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix scale factors applied to AEIC VOC emissions - Closes #915 #1067
Fix scale factors applied to AEIC VOC emissions - Closes #915 #1067
Conversation
Tagging @sdeastham and the Emissions Working Group (@eamarais), who can better answer about the speciation than I can. It looks like a straightforward modification. |
Sorry, I was checking this again and realized I made a small mistake allocating dodecenal. There were also some mistakes when copying the names of the species into the list below, which is now correct:
|
All GCHP integration tests pass ==============================================================================
GCHP: Execution Test Results
Number of execution tests: 3
==============================================================================
Execution tests:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gchp_fullchem_benchmark_merra2_c48...............Execute Simulation.....PASS
gchp_fullchem_standard_merra2_c24................Execute Simulation.....PASS
gchp_TransportTracers_geosfp_c24.................Execute Simulation.....PASS
Summary of execution test results:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Execution tests passed: 3
Execution tests failed: 0
Execution tests not completed: 0
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%% All execution tests passed! %%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
All GEOS-Chem Classic integration tests passed: Summary of test results:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Execution tests passed: 48
Execution tests failed: 0
Execution tests not yet completed: 0
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%% All execution tests passed! %%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
Emissions totals that are affected: alpha.12 alpha.13 diff %diff
ALK4 Aircraft : 0.005617 0.004274 -0.001343 -23.912
C2H6 Aircraft : 0.000152 0.000122 -0.000031 -20.213
C3H8 Aircraft : 0.000022 0.000018 -0.000004 -18.386
MACR Aircraft : 0.001827 0.000100 -0.001727 -94.522
PRPE Aircraft : 0.004855 0.003779 -0.001076 -22.168
RCHO Aircraft : 0.001384 0.003358 0.001974 142.621 Benchmark results can be seen at: In general, the changes to oxidant and primary organics are negligible. OH metrics change very slightly (Mean OH -0.005%, MCF lifetime +0.006%, CH4 lifetime +0.006%). |
This is a PR for #915 removing the unnecessary application of factors 40-42, 45, 46, 49, 83, 84 to aviation VOC emissions, and doing the speciation into more GEOS-Chem tracers. I am not 100% sure how things were lumped before such that ALK4, PRPE, MACR, RCHO are a bit different here. I used the following mapping: