Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PULL REQUEST] More stable stratospheric H2O boundary condition #689

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 21, 2021

Conversation

sdeastham
Copy link
Contributor

By selecting the "static" H2O option in input.geos, the user can now request that stratospheric water vapor be specified up to 70 hPa in the tropics. This results in a more stable water vapor signal in the stratosphere. If this option is not selected, the water vapor in the stratosphere may grow continuously over multi-year simulations.

The change significantly reduces the accumulation when running a full-chemistry simulation at C24 in GCHP (see plot; old approach on the right, new approach on the left).

image

By selecting the "static" H2O option in input.geos, the user
can now request that stratospheric water vapor be specified
up to 70 hPa in the tropics. This results in a more stable
water vapor signal in the stratosphere. If this option is
not selected, the water vapor in the stratosphere may grow
continuously over multi-year simulations.
@msulprizio msulprizio self-assigned this Apr 12, 2021
@msulprizio msulprizio self-requested a review April 12, 2021 15:23
@msulprizio msulprizio added this to the 13.1.0 milestone Apr 12, 2021
@msulprizio msulprizio changed the base branch from main to dev April 12, 2021 15:23
@yantosca yantosca changed the title More stable stratospheric H2O boundary condition [PULL REQUEST] More stable stratospheric H2O boundary condition Apr 12, 2021
@msulprizio msulprizio merged commit e603d53 into geoschem:dev Apr 21, 2021
@msulprizio
Copy link
Contributor

NOTE: I moved the switch for this option to the Chemistry Menu in input.geos since the Emissions Menu was removed in 13.0.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants