Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can the daisydiff keep the style tag? #4

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Nov 10, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Can the daisydiff keep the style tag? #4

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Nov 10, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

I am a new user to use the jar file for comparing two pages.
However, after the comparison, the css include tags are deleted. 
Resulting in messy for the result page.

Thank you for your hard working in this project. And I am looking forward 
to hearing from you.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by davidcho...@gmail.com on 13 Jan 2009 at 5:17

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Have you tried using the --css= option?

It would be nice if this was recognized automatically.

Original comment by guy...@gmail.com on 13 Jan 2009 at 9:49

  • Changed state: Accepted
  • Added labels: Type-Enhancement
  • Removed labels: Type-Defect

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your replying.
However, I think it is better if the diff engine can recognize them 
automatically. 
As I think there is no need to compare the css include tag or js include tag.
So, there is no way to keep them in the result page, right?

May I ask when will the next version be released? I am using this nice tool 
very happily.

Original comment by davidcho...@gmail.com on 13 Jan 2009 at 10:39

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I agree that it would be a nice feature.

Development is suspended indefinitely. I developed the library during an 
internship
but I have no use for it myself. I can only make time to fix bugs and assist 
other
devs that try to add functionality. I'm not in a position that I can do 
development
of new features myself. Sorry about that.

Original comment by guy...@gmail.com on 13 Jan 2009 at 10:46

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant