Ascending reward system to stave off insta-mining, pre-mining, unfair rewards for early adopters.
Block 1 - 2016 @ 1 NBL Block 2017 - 4032 @ 2 NBL Block 4033 - 6047 @ 4 NBL Block 6048 - 8063 @ 8 NBL Block 8064 - 10079 @ 16 NBL Block 10080 - 12095 @ 32 NBL *** Difficulty SHOULD reach 1+ at this point. Total NBL mined = 127,004 Block 12096 - 219555 @ 50 NBL Block 219556 - 639555 @ 25 NBL
21,000,004 total NBL (4 more than Bitcoin) 639,555 total blocks 2 1/2 minute blocks (4 times faster than Bitcoin) 2016 Block Difficulty Retarget
Why is this system better?
Litecoin's 1st 12,096 blocks produced 604,800 LTC - though GPU mining wasn't released to the general public (but that's not it wasn't used) Feathercoin's 1st 12,096 blocks produced 2,419,200 FTC Nibble's 1st 12,096 blocks will produce 127,054 NBL
Ports: 8550 Connect 8551 JSON RPC
- Download the client or daemon for your OS
- Launch the or daemon.
- Create a nibble.conf file in the correct location for yoru OS:
Windows: %appdata%\nibble\nibble.conf Linux: ~/.nibble/nibble.conf
rpcuser=[replace with username] rpcpassword=[replace with password] rpcport=[replace with any port you wish] rpcallowip=[* for all, or IP of a remote system] daemon=1 server=1
- start your daemon or client with the -server option.
For example: >nibble-qt.exe -server
- Point your favorite miner to the IP of the machine running the server. Use the port and username/password as specified in the above nibble.conf file.
Developers work in their own trees, then submit pull requests when they think their feature or bug fix is ready.
The patch will be accepted if there is broad consensus that it is a good thing. Developers should expect to rework and resubmit patches if they don't match the project's coding conventions (see coding.txt) or are controversial.
The master branch is regularly built and tested, but is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are regularly created to indicate new official, stable release versions of Litecoin.
Feature branches are created when there are major new features being worked on by several people.
From time to time a pull request will become outdated. If this occurs, and the pull is no longer automatically mergeable; a comment on the pull will be used to issue a warning of closure. The pull will be closed 15 days after the warning if action is not taken by the author. Pull requests closed in this manner will have their corresponding issue labeled 'stagnant'.
Issues with no commits will be given a similar warning, and closed after 15 days from their last activity. Issues closed in this manner will be labeled 'stale'.
Check out http://getnibble.org for more info about the development.