Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Teradata SQL #2762

Open
dclong opened this issue Aug 24, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Support Teradata SQL #2762

dclong opened this issue Aug 24, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@dclong
Copy link

dclong commented Aug 24, 2018

Is there any plan to support Teradata SQL?

@arikfr
Copy link
Member

arikfr commented Aug 29, 2018

There is no one who is actively working on it that I know of, but maybe somewhere someone is actually doing this at the moment. 🤷‍♂️

We are always happy to accept pull requests for new data sources/query runners. If you're interested in implementing support for Teradata, you might find this post useful: https://discuss.redash.io/t/creating-a-new-query-runner-data-source-in-redash/347.

mateuka pushed a commit to mateuka/redash that referenced this issue May 11, 2020
@mateuka mateuka mentioned this issue May 11, 2020
1 task
@subbareddydagumati
Copy link

Any plans to include this feature in next redash release?. Please let me know if you need help in test teradata datasource.

@chrispward
Copy link

Where are you creating a connector to Teradata?
Its amazing that u dont have a connector working for the biggest database in the world.
Looks like someone create a connector last year but it was not implemented.
Can someone look at.
I'd be happy to test.

@justinclift
Copy link
Member

Note that there's an initial implementation for Teradata support in #4881.

That PR needs a bit of minor clean up before it can be merged though. So if someone has basic Python skills and is interested in helping out, that one's probably a good starting point. 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants