New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Confusing comment in a db migration #6200
Comments
Good point. Possibly a typo in one of the pieces. Let's ask. @osule What are your thoughts on this? 😄 |
@eugene-nikolaev It should be corrected to case-sensitive hash of query text |
Anyone want to create a PR for that? It'll be merged fairly quickly. 😄 |
BTW had issues which maybe caused with this migration on existing 10.1 instance. Also reverting from current master to 10.1 back required some hacking as some strings did not fit in that limit=320.
Hopefully I'll be able to tinker with it and create proper issues/PRs. |
Ouch. Yeah, our current CI tests are good for some stuff. But we really need to also set up some more in-depth automatic testing with actual proper test data and have it run "like" it would in production. I have some ideas, but it's not something I'll get to this week personally. Fixing more immediate stuff first. 😄 Btw, when you do do want to tinker with stuff then we've recently been working on decent instructions for setting up your local dev environment: https://github.com/getredash/redash/wiki/Local-development-setup The stuff on the wiki is known to work, whereas the "developer setup guides" (currently) on the official Redash knowledge base are still pretty busted. We'll need to migrate the wiki content there at some point, but it's not a high priority (yet). 😄 |
Issue Summary
Issue in the code comment (opposite meaning).
Commit title says:
But in the migration:
Which have the opposite meaning.
Should be written as:
Steps to Reproduce
Not applicable
Technical details:
No matter
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: