Feat: Client Report Envelope Item

[denrase]

#skip-changelog

📜 Description

Create envelope item from client report model.

💡 Motivation and Context

The item will be added to an envelope so we can send it to the backend.

💚 How did you test it?

Unit tests.

📝 Checklist

• I reviewed submitted code
• I added tests to verify changes
• I updated the docs if needed
• All tests passing
• No breaking changes

[brustolin]

Regarding the code, it looks good to me.
I'm not fully aware of the specifics on "client report".

@marandaneto can take a look at that.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #810 (1c38943) into feat/client-report-recorder (4576880) will increase coverage by 0.23%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@                       Coverage Diff                       @@
##           feat/client-report-recorder     #810      +/-   ##
===============================================================
+ Coverage                        89.70%   89.94%   +0.23%     
===============================================================
  Files                              118        9     -109     
  Lines                             3700      169    -3531     
===============================================================
- Hits                              3319      152    -3167     
+ Misses                             381       17     -364     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
dart/lib/src/client_reports/client_report.dart
dart/lib/src/client_reports/discarded_event.dart
dart/lib/src/sentry_envelope_item.dart
dart/lib/src/http_client/tracing_client.dart
dart/lib/src/integration.dart
dart/lib/src/protocol/max_request_body_size.dart
dart/lib/src/protocol/debug_meta.dart
dart/lib/src/throwable_mechanism.dart
...lib/src/environment/_io_environment_variables.dart
dart/lib/src/protocol/dsn.dart
... and 99 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4576880...1c38943. Read the comment docs.

[philipphofmann]

LGTM from a high-level concept point of view. Can't add some feedback to the dart code. Thanks for doing this 👏

[mattjohnsonpint]

Conceptually seems fine. Though I see some build check failures?

[marandaneto]

Conceptually seems fine. Though I see some build check failures?

A few files were renamed but not on test files, likely a merging issue @denrase ?

[denrase]

@marandaneto Sry about that, let me check/fix