Add MemoryInfo to sentry event

[SimonCropp]

fixes #627

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1337 (b064d72) into main (eb191c9) will increase coverage by 1.65%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head b064d72 differs from pull request most recent head 6e234b2. Consider uploading reports for the commit 6e234b2 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1337      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.36%   83.01%   +1.65%     
==========================================
  Files         216      217       +1     
  Lines        7180     7295     +115     
  Branches     1410     1411       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         5842     6056     +214     
+ Misses        912      804     -108     
- Partials      426      435       +9     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/Sentry/Internal/MainSentryEventProcessor.cs	92.70% <100.00%> (+3.00%)	⬆️
src/Sentry/Internal/MemoryInfo.cs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/Sentry/Internal/AppDomainAdapter.cs	66.66% <0.00%> (ø)
src/Sentry/PlatformAbstractions/RuntimeInfo.cs	58.62% <0.00%> (+5.17%)	⬆️
...ntry/Integrations/NetFxInstallationsIntegration.cs	57.14% <0.00%> (+28.57%)	⬆️
...ntry/PlatformAbstractions/FrameworkInstallation.cs	62.50% <0.00%> (+37.50%)	⬆️
...rmAbstractions/NetFxInstallationsEventProcessor.cs	72.72% <0.00%> (+68.18%)	⬆️
...Sentry/PlatformAbstractions/FrameworkInfo.NetFx.cs	70.42% <0.00%> (+70.42%)	⬆️
src/Sentry/PlatformAbstractions/FrameworkInfo.cs	100.00% <0.00%> (+100.00%)	⬆️
...ntry/PlatformAbstractions/RegistryKeyExtensions.cs	100.00% <0.00%> (+100.00%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update eb191c9...6e234b2. Read the comment docs.

[bruno-garcia]

I like this!

[SimonCropp]

@bruno-garcia does this need extra tests? and if so, is there any similar tests i can use as a template?

[bruno-garcia]

@bruno-garcia does this need extra tests? and if so, is there any similar tests i can use as a template?

I'm looking at tests on MainEventProcessor and some make sense:

sentry-dotnet/test/Sentry.Tests/Internals/MainSentryEventProcessorTests.cs

Lines 445 to 460 in ad9f5ff

	[Fact]
	public void Process_DifferentCultureInfoAndCultureUiInfo_CultureInfoAndCultureUiInfoSet()
	{
	//Arrange
	var sut = _fixture.GetSut();
	var evt = new SentryEvent(new Exception());
	CultureInfo.CurrentCulture = new CultureInfo(1041);
	CultureInfo.CurrentUICulture = new CultureInfo(1033);
	//Act
	evt = sut.Process(evt);
	//Assert
	Assert.True(evt.Contexts.ContainsKey(MainSentryEventProcessor.CurrentUiCultureKey));
	Assert.True(evt.Contexts.ContainsKey(MainSentryEventProcessor.CultureInfoKey));
	}

Though things that have side effect are not being rolled back, now that I see it. Like:

sentry-dotnet/test/Sentry.Tests/Internals/MainSentryEventProcessorTests.cs

Lines 434 to 435 in ad9f5ff

	CultureInfo.CurrentCulture = new CultureInfo(1042);
	CultureInfo.CurrentUICulture = new CultureInfo(1042);

[bruno-garcia]

[bruno-garcia]

Oh, we should've added this as feature. Rolled out as 3.12.3