Add SentryWrapper for Callable and Supplier Interface

[lbloder]

📜 Description

Allow Injection of SentryHub into Callable and Supplier Contexts.

💡 Motivation and Context

Fixes #2426

💚 How did you test it?

📝 Checklist

• I reviewed the submitted code.
• I added tests to verify the changes.
• No new PII added or SDK only sends newly added PII if sendDefaultPII is enabled.
• I updated the docs if needed.
• Review from the native team if needed.
• No breaking change or entry added to the changelog.
• No breaking change for hybrid SDKs or communicated to hybrid SDKs.

🔮 Next steps

[github-actions]

	Fails
🚫	Please consider adding a changelog entry for the next release.

	Messages
📖	Do not forget to update Sentry-docs with your feature once the pull request gets approved.

Instructions and example for changelog

Please add an entry to CHANGELOG.md to the "Unreleased" section. Make sure the entry includes this PR's number.

Example:

## Unreleased

- Add SentryWrapper for Callable and Supplier Interface ([#2720](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-java/pull/2720))

If none of the above apply, you can opt out of this check by adding #skip-changelog to the PR description.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 1078f4a

[lbloder]

Not yet ready for review. Created the draft PR to have the checks run

[github-actions]

Performance metrics 🚀

	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
Startup time	361.24 ms	406.20 ms	44.96 ms
Size	1.72 MiB	2.28 MiB	570.95 KiB

Baseline results on branch: main

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
46b1782	387.72 ms	458.74 ms	71.02 ms
1707044	338.80 ms	384.79 ms	46.00 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
46b1782	1.72 MiB	2.28 MiB	570.44 KiB
1707044	1.72 MiB	2.28 MiB	570.44 KiB

Previous results on branch: feat/wrap_callable_supplier

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
05983b3	348.50 ms	391.60 ms	43.10 ms
207c2b4	311.66 ms	354.66 ms	43.00 ms
b934ebe	295.77 ms	379.27 ms	83.50 ms
998fee2	311.46 ms	383.30 ms	71.84 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
05983b3	1.72 MiB	2.28 MiB	570.44 KiB
207c2b4	1.72 MiB	2.28 MiB	570.45 KiB
b934ebe	1.72 MiB	2.28 MiB	570.44 KiB
998fee2	1.72 MiB	2.28 MiB	570.44 KiB

[adinauer]

Should we automatically capture exceptions in there? Maybe configurable to turn on/off?

[adinauer]

Should we automatically capture exceptions in there? Maybe configurable to turn on/off?

To not block this PR, let's decide via #2729

[markushi]

Looks good to me!

[markushi]

Nit-picking here, but I think this could be simplified to the following. In theory it's also technically "more correct" in case some other thread is executing Sentry.setCurrentHub in between those statements.

Suggested change

	final IHub oldState = Sentry.getCurrentHub();
	final IHub newHub = Sentry.getCurrentHub().clone();
	final IHub oldHub = Sentry.getCurrentHub();
	final IHub newHub = oldHub.clone();

[markushi]

Oh I see that Sentry.currentHub is thread-local anyway for non global hub mode setups (ThreadLocal<IHub> currentHub), so my suggestion only improves if globalHubMode=true.

[stefanosiano]

just a couple of quick changes
looks good for the rest

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 92.30% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (e5c250b) 81.11% compared to head (1078f4a) 81.12%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #2720   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     81.11%   81.12%           
- Complexity     4449     4453    +4     
=========================================
  Files           345      346    +1     
  Lines         16407    16420   +13     
  Branches       2226     2226           
=========================================
+ Hits          13308    13320   +12     
- Misses         2172     2173    +1     
  Partials        927      927           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
sentry/src/main/java/io/sentry/SentryWrapper.java	92.30% <92.30%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.