Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't wait on main thread when SDK restarts #3200

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Feb 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

stefanosiano
Copy link
Member

📜 Description

added new methods to close instances with isRestarting flag:

  • IHub.close(Boolean)
  • ISentryClient.close(Boolean)
  • ITransport.close(Boolean)

when the SDK restarts

  • the executor service is now closed in the background
  • current network connections are dropped. This is not a problem, as data will be sent anyway after the SDK restarts

We still wait for any processing that is happening, as that's more complex, but the biggest slowdown when restarting the SDK is waiting for the network to send data.

💡 Motivation and Context

When the SDK is initialized multiple times, it closes the old instance, waiting for any task to be completed.
This PR aims to reduce the wait time by dropping network connections and let any job scheduled to the executor to be finished in the background.
Relates to #3162

💚 How did you test it?

Unit tests
Added Ui test to check it waits for network to timeout on Sentry.close and doesn't wait on multiple Sentry.init()

📝 Checklist

  • I reviewed the submitted code.
  • I added tests to verify the changes.
  • No new PII added or SDK only sends newly added PII if sendDefaultPII is enabled.
  • I updated the docs if needed.
  • Review from the native team if needed.
  • No breaking change or entry added to the changelog.
  • No breaking change for hybrid SDKs or communicated to hybrid SDKs.

🔮 Next steps

- IHub.close(Boolean)
- ISentryClient.close(Boolean)
- ITransport.close(Boolean)

when the SDK restarts, the executor service is now closed in the background, and current network connections are dropped
@stefanosiano stefanosiano marked this pull request as ready for review February 8, 2024 11:45
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Performance metrics 🚀

  Plain With Sentry Diff
Startup time 439.57 ms 518.85 ms 79.28 ms
Size 1.70 MiB 2.27 MiB 585.11 KiB

Baseline results on branch: main

Startup times

Revision Plain With Sentry Diff
93a76ca 377.96 ms 447.52 ms 69.56 ms
baaf637 462.32 ms 579.22 ms 116.90 ms
2465853 411.39 ms 461.10 ms 49.72 ms
c3f503e 360.41 ms 434.67 ms 74.27 ms
93a76ca 381.08 ms 459.22 ms 78.14 ms
c7e2fbc 393.98 ms 478.24 ms 84.27 ms
2465853 422.61 ms 491.20 ms 68.58 ms
5e04ee8 302.68 ms 343.36 ms 40.68 ms
283d83e 416.81 ms 497.22 ms 80.41 ms
d6d2b2e 413.20 ms 486.76 ms 73.56 ms

App size

Revision Plain With Sentry Diff
93a76ca 1.72 MiB 2.29 MiB 576.75 KiB
baaf637 1.72 MiB 2.27 MiB 558.42 KiB
2465853 1.70 MiB 2.27 MiB 583.82 KiB
c3f503e 1.72 MiB 2.29 MiB 577.04 KiB
93a76ca 1.72 MiB 2.29 MiB 576.75 KiB
c7e2fbc 1.72 MiB 2.29 MiB 576.40 KiB
2465853 1.70 MiB 2.27 MiB 583.82 KiB
5e04ee8 1.70 MiB 2.27 MiB 584.64 KiB
283d83e 1.72 MiB 2.29 MiB 577.69 KiB
d6d2b2e 1.72 MiB 2.27 MiB 555.05 KiB

Previous results on branch: enh/dont-wait-restart

Startup times

Revision Plain With Sentry Diff
588e62b 318.55 ms 360.32 ms 41.77 ms
0807309 368.15 ms 456.16 ms 88.02 ms
866a6af 614.82 ms 743.69 ms 128.87 ms
0d43908 410.02 ms 483.90 ms 73.88 ms
0e03bb0 367.81 ms 440.85 ms 73.05 ms
4dc1651 376.40 ms 456.41 ms 80.01 ms

App size

Revision Plain With Sentry Diff
588e62b 1.70 MiB 2.27 MiB 584.99 KiB
0807309 1.70 MiB 2.27 MiB 585.11 KiB
866a6af 1.70 MiB 2.27 MiB 585.11 KiB
0d43908 1.70 MiB 2.27 MiB 585.00 KiB
0e03bb0 1.70 MiB 2.27 MiB 584.98 KiB
4dc1651 1.70 MiB 2.27 MiB 585.11 KiB

@stefanosiano stefanosiano marked this pull request as draft February 8, 2024 15:01
@stefanosiano
Copy link
Member Author

I added a small timeout to AsyncHttpTransport when restarting, so that we have time to eventually write any rejected envelope to disk.
I don't really like it, so I'm trying to find a way to improve it

…ectedExecutionHandler, to save the envelope to disk
@stefanosiano
Copy link
Member Author

I added a small timeout to AsyncHttpTransport when restarting, so that we have time to eventually write any rejected envelope to disk. I don't really like it, so I'm trying to find a way to improve it

Ok, I removed that small timeout. Now, when AsyncHttpTransport closes and calls executor.shutdownNow(), all the current runnables go throught the rejectedExecutionHandler, that store the envelope to disk

@stefanosiano stefanosiano marked this pull request as ready for review February 9, 2024 11:35
Copy link
Member

@markushi markushi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good, I left 2 comments for clarification!

}

@Test
fun `close shuts down the executor and runs executing runnable through rejectedExecutionHandler`() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice 👍

Copy link
Member

@markushi markushi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@stefanosiano stefanosiano merged commit f33a11d into main Feb 16, 2024
24 checks passed
@stefanosiano stefanosiano deleted the enh/dont-wait-restart branch February 16, 2024 10:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants