Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Verifying that merging master into sentry-sdk-2.0 was done correctly #2681

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 26, 2024

Conversation

sentrivana
Copy link
Contributor


General Notes

Thank you for contributing to sentry-python!

Please add tests to validate your changes, and lint your code using tox -e linters.

Running the test suite on your PR might require maintainer approval. Some tests (AWS Lambda) additionally require a maintainer to add a special label to run and will fail if the label is not present.

For maintainers

Sensitive test suites require maintainer review to ensure that tests do not compromise our secrets. This review must be repeated after any code revisions.

Before running sensitive test suites, please carefully check the PR. Then, apply the Trigger: tests using secrets label. The label will be removed after any code changes to enforce our policy requiring maintainers to review all code revisions before running sensitive tests.

antonpirker and others added 4 commits January 25, 2024 08:51
* Moved redis related tests to databases
---------

Co-authored-by: Ivana Kellyerova <ivana.kellyerova@sentry.io>
This cleans up existing code and reorganizes it to have a clean foundation for the refactoring the Hub and Scopes. It moves functionality away from the Hub into the Scope respectively the Client.
@sentrivana sentrivana merged commit d600037 into sentry-sdk-2.0 Jan 26, 2024
109 of 111 checks passed
@sentrivana sentrivana deleted the ivana/test-merge branch January 26, 2024 15:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants