Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ref: Improve _sigtramp workaround and explanation #662

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 17, 2022
Merged

Conversation

Swatinem
Copy link
Member

@Swatinem Swatinem commented Aug 16, 2022

The reason for our _sigtramp workaround is lack of support for DWARF expressions.
This fact is documented in more detail, and the hand-crafted ASCII CFI is extended to
all the call preserved (callee saves) registers.

The reason for our _sigtramp workaround is lack of support for DWARF expressions.
This fact is documented in more detail, and the hand-crafted ASCII CFI is extended to
all the call preserved (callee saves) registers.
@Swatinem Swatinem marked this pull request as ready for review August 17, 2022 12:03
@Swatinem Swatinem requested a review from a team August 17, 2022 12:03
@Swatinem Swatinem merged commit c61abc0 into master Aug 17, 2022
@Swatinem Swatinem deleted the ref/sigtramp branch August 17, 2022 12:22
loewenheim added a commit to getsentry/symbolicator that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2022
This includes the following fixes:

- Correctly resolve the `DW_AT_producer` attribute of DWARF files ([#676](getsentry/symbolic#676))
- Improve _sigtramp workaround and explanation ([#662](getsentry/symbolic#662))
- Slightly lower demangling recursion limit ([#655](getsentry/symbolic#655))
loewenheim added a commit to getsentry/symbolicator that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2022
This includes the following fixes:

- Correctly resolve the `DW_AT_producer` attribute of DWARF files ([#676](getsentry/symbolic#676))
- Improve _sigtramp workaround and explanation ([#662](getsentry/symbolic#662))
- Slightly lower demangling recursion limit ([#655](getsentry/symbolic#655))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants