You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Warning: Found invalidly used HTML closing tag for 'b' on line 1866
I opened that file via vim and +1866 which I think jumps to the line.
The line at hand was:
The file <b>examples/complex/016_grid_example.rb</b> shows
this new API, mixed with the old, original API.
This is documentation for one of my gems. I use a README.gen
file to generate a README.md, using some scripts and macros.
I believe the line should work though. Not sure why kramdown
complains.
kramdown version is using: 2.4.0
Anyway, could you add the above to a test for kramdown perhaps?
Perhaps I made a mistake, but either way I'll report it here.
I am receiving some warnings in other projects. At some later
point I may give you a more thorough analysis of the
warnings kramdown generates - which is super-useful but
sometimes confusing too. Perhaps kramdown could also
show some more information or so, a bit like the
did-you-mean gem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I can confirm that the warning is issued and that it is wrongly issued.
The reason for this is that the <b> gets parsed and put onto the parse stack. When the _grid_ part is seen, the parser thinks it is an emphasis and tries to parse it, then comes across the </b> which it thinks is invalid (and would be so if the emphasis was correct). When it later determines that the emphasis is invalid, parsing continues at the grid_ part and later the </b> is found and correctly used.
Will need to think about how to tackle this.
nuclearsandwich
added a commit
to ros-infrastructure/answers-archive
that referenced
this issue
Mar 29, 2024
kramdown seems to be having issues with certain HTML elements.
I was specifically hung up on gz/question/132 but it seems to be a known
issue gettalong/kramdown#766
I got this error message recently:
I opened that file via vim and +1866 which I think jumps to the line.
The line at hand was:
This is documentation for one of my gems. I use a README.gen
file to generate a README.md, using some scripts and macros.
I believe the line should work though. Not sure why kramdown
complains.
kramdown version is using: 2.4.0
Anyway, could you add the above to a test for kramdown perhaps?
Perhaps I made a mistake, but either way I'll report it here.
I am receiving some warnings in other projects. At some later
point I may give you a more thorough analysis of the
warnings kramdown generates - which is super-useful but
sometimes confusing too. Perhaps kramdown could also
show some more information or so, a bit like the
did-you-mean gem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: