Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: improve build & types exports for all targets, Node, CJS/ESM #1188

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 11, 2023

Conversation

ghiscoding
Copy link
Owner

@ghiscoding ghiscoding commented Nov 11, 2023

  • previous implementation didn't pass all type exports as can be shown in Are the types wrong? website, already applied the changes in multiple-select-vanilla library with a much greater success
  • better approach came from RxJS package.json great implementation of it

image

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1188 (0b25ada) into master (bb77376) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master     #1188   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          245       245           
  Lines        17271     17271           
  Branches      6244      6244           
=========================================
  Hits         17271     17271           

@ghiscoding ghiscoding changed the title fix: adjust types & exports for all bundlers, Node, CJS/ESM fix: improve build & types exports for all bundlers, Node, CJS/ESM Nov 11, 2023
@ghiscoding ghiscoding changed the title fix: improve build & types exports for all bundlers, Node, CJS/ESM fix: improve build & types exports for all targets, Node, CJS/ESM Nov 11, 2023
@ghiscoding ghiscoding merged commit 980fd68 into master Nov 11, 2023
5 checks passed
@ghiscoding ghiscoding deleted the bugfix/wrong-types branch November 11, 2023 18:44
@ghiscoding
Copy link
Owner Author

Much better after releasing a new version with this change :)

image

ghiscoding added a commit to ghiscoding/aurelia-slickgrid that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
- update to latest Slickgrid-Universal which has the following 2 changes
  1. add missing `@types/trusted-types` deps, fixes issue #1313
  2. Slickgrid-Universal has improved types exports for TS Types discovery as can be shown in its [PR 1188](ghiscoding/slickgrid-universal#1188) and [Are the types wrong?](https://arethetypeswrong.github.io/?p=%40slickgrid-universal%2Fcommon%403.5.1) website
ghiscoding added a commit to ghiscoding/slickgrid-react that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
- update to latest Slickgrid-Universal which has the following 2 changes
  1. add missing `@types/trusted-types` deps, fixes issue #1313
  2. Slickgrid-Universal has improved types exports for TS Types discovery as can be shown in its [PR 1188](ghiscoding/slickgrid-universal#1188) and [Are the types wrong?](https://arethetypeswrong.github.io/?p=%40slickgrid-universal%2Fcommon%403.5.1) website
ghiscoding added a commit to ghiscoding/aurelia-slickgrid that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
- update to latest Slickgrid-Universal which has the following 2 changes
  1. add missing `@types/trusted-types` deps, fixes issue #1313
  2. Slickgrid-Universal has improved types exports for TS Types discovery as can be shown in its [PR 1188](ghiscoding/slickgrid-universal#1188) and [Are the types wrong?](https://arethetypeswrong.github.io/?p=%40slickgrid-universal%2Fcommon%403.5.1) website
ghiscoding added a commit to ghiscoding/slickgrid-react that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
- update to latest Slickgrid-Universal which has the following 2 changes
  1. add missing `@types/trusted-types` deps, fixes issue #1313
  2. Slickgrid-Universal has improved types exports for TS Types discovery as can be shown in its [PR 1188](ghiscoding/slickgrid-universal#1188) and [Are the types wrong?](https://arethetypeswrong.github.io/?p=%40slickgrid-universal%2Fcommon%403.5.1) website
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant