skip unexported fields for bindings #123
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Mayb provide a test? I wouldn't know what this improves. |
|
Take a look at my merge request if you are interested in better support for the bindings #67. Since it hasn't been merged in over a month though i'm really not sure what is going on with the state of the project. You can also just include my main repo to get some better json validation https://github.com/michaeljs1990/val all is well documented and tested. |
|
+1 for this pull request, required change. |
|
Sorry for the long delay. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just a little check so it does not panic if the struct contains an unexported field.