Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix cleanPath spell #969

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 4, 2017
Merged

fix cleanPath spell #969

merged 1 commit into from Jul 4, 2017

Conversation

thinkerou
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 4, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #969 into develop will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #969   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    96.17%   96.17%           
========================================
  Files           16       16           
  Lines         1413     1413           
========================================
  Hits          1359     1359           
  Misses          43       43           
  Partials        11       11
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
path.go 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a8ea89e...989b3bc. Read the comment docs.

@appleboy appleboy merged commit 6613cdb into gin-gonic:develop Jul 4, 2017
appleboy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2017
@javierprovecho javierprovecho added this to the 1.3 milestone Jul 5, 2017
@thinkerou thinkerou deleted the fix_spell_cleanPath branch July 9, 2017 10:31
appleboy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2017
* fix cleanPath spell (#969)

* linter and optimize structs
flame4 pushed a commit to flame4/gin that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2017
* fix cleanPath spell (gin-gonic#969)

* linter and optimize structs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants