-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 676
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Insight: Posts using "literally" #2021
Comments
In the list of posts, do we show the replies that have the word literally, or the posts that had replies with literally in them? We should probably cut this off at some number of posts. I don't know if we have a standard, or how many looks dumb. ( @ginatrapani @capndesign ) Also, generally, I think we need to be more specific about when to do monthly or weekly insights, so we can avoid piling them up all on certain days. (ie. Monthly (on the 13th)) |
I think we show the replies that have the word literally. Re scheduling: Said elsewhere, but agreed! And working on a better approach. |
@cdmoyer Monthly on the 7th (Twitter), 14 (Fb). Annually on April 23rd. |
(Does April 23 have a significance?) |
@anildash Yeah, so this is very loose editorial calendaring: April 23rd is "English Language Day" — I'm very open to anything better on the annual calendar. (Also, will make sure to call out the thoughts behind the annual dates in these issues going forward.) |
One-liner
Posts in your network using "literally".
Full explainer
As the word "literally" works its way from its literal meaning to something decidedly more figurative, it's interesting to watch the evolution — both in our own use and that of those we interact with. This insight tracks usage of "literally" in our own posts and in the comments and replies to our posts. It should be fun and avoid taking any sort of stance or coming off as preachy/pretentious.
Audience for the insight
This insight works on Twitter and Facebook.
How often this insight runs
Headline
Body
Then:
Criteria and logic
This insight needs the previous period's worth of posts by and replies/comments/mentions to the user. Then just searching for "literally".
There is no baseline.
Minimum threshold: At least three matches.
Included elements
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: