Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #10 from jason-fox/patch-3
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Add AGPL Statement
  • Loading branch information
sonsoleslp committed Feb 20, 2019
2 parents ec86d00 + 9ba3f44 commit b6380e8
Showing 1 changed file with 21 additions and 3 deletions.
24 changes: 21 additions & 3 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ This project is part of [FIWARE](https://www.fiware.org/). For more information
check the FIWARE Catalogue entry for
[Context Processing, Analysis and Visualization](https://github.com/Fiware/catalogue/tree/master/processing).

| :books: [Documentation](https://fiware-cosmos-flink.readthedocs.io) | :mortar_board: [Academy](https://fiware-academy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/processing/cosmos) |
| --- | ---|
| :books: [Documentation](https://fiware-cosmos-flink.readthedocs.io) | :mortar_board: [Academy](https://fiware-academy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/processing/cosmos) | :dart: [Roadmap](https://github.com/ging/fiware-cosmos-orion-flink-connector/blob/master/ROADMAP.md)
| --- | ---|---|

## Table of Contents

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -223,4 +223,22 @@ mvn clean test -Dtest=*Test cobertura:cobertura coveralls:report -Padd-dependenc

## License

Cosmos is licensed under Affero General Public License (GPL) version 3.
Cosmos is licensed under [Affero General Public License (GPL)
version 3](./LICENSE).

### Are there any legal issues with AGPL 3.0? Is it safe for me to use?

There is absolutely no problem in using a product licensed under AGPL 3.0. Issues with GPL
(or AGPL) licenses are mostly related with the fact that different people assign different
interpretations on the meaning of the term “derivate work” used in these licenses. Due to this,
some people believe that there is a risk in just _using_ software under GPL or AGPL licenses
(even without _modifying_ it).

For the avoidance of doubt, the owners of this software licensed under an AGPL-3.0 license
wish to make a clarifying public statement as follows:

> Please note that software derived as a result of modifying the source code of this
> software in order to fix a bug or incorporate enhancements is considered a derivative
> work of the product. Software that merely uses or aggregates (i.e. links to) an otherwise
> unmodified version of existing software is not considered a derivative work, and therefore
> it does not need to be released as under the same license, or even released as open source.

0 comments on commit b6380e8

Please sign in to comment.