Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
pack-objects: fix pack generation when using pack_size_limit
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Current handling of pack_size_limit is quite suboptimal.  Let's consider
a list of objects to pack which contain alternatively big and small
objects (which pretty matches reality when big blobs are interlaced
with tree objects).  Currently, the code simply close the pack and opens
a new one when the next object in line breaks the size limit.

The current code may degenerate into:

  - small tree object => store into pack #1
  - big blob object busting the pack size limit => store into pack #2
  - small blob but pack #2 is over the limit already => pack #3
  - big blob busting the size limit => pack #4
  - small tree but pack #4 is over the limit => pack #5
  - big blob => pack #6
  - small tree => pack #7
  - ... and so on.

The reality is that the content of packs 1, 3, 5 and 7 could well be
stored more efficiently (and delta compressed) together in pack #1 if
the big blobs were not forcing an immediate transition to a new pack.

Incidentally this can be fixed pretty easily by simply skipping over
those objects that are too big to fit in the current pack while trying
the whole list of unwritten objects, and then that list considered from
the beginning again when a new pack is opened.  This creates much fewer
smallish pack files and help making more predictable test cases for the
test suite.

This change made one of the self sanity checks useless so it is removed
as well. That check was rather redundant already anyway.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
  • Loading branch information
npitre authored and gitster committed Feb 4, 2010
1 parent 2fca19f commit a2430dd
Showing 1 changed file with 13 additions and 24 deletions.
37 changes: 13 additions & 24 deletions builtin-pack-objects.c
Expand Up @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static unsigned long write_object(struct sha1file *f,

type = entry->type;

/* write limit if limited packsize and not first object */
/* apply size limit if limited packsize and not first object */
if (!pack_size_limit || !nr_written)
limit = 0;
else if (pack_size_limit <= write_offset)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -443,11 +443,15 @@ static int write_one(struct sha1file *f,

/* offset is non zero if object is written already. */
if (e->idx.offset || e->preferred_base)
return 1;
return -1;

/* if we are deltified, write out base object first. */
if (e->delta && !write_one(f, e->delta, offset))
return 0;
/*
* If we are deltified, attempt to write out base object first.
* If that fails due to the pack size limit then the current
* object might still possibly fit undeltified within that limit.
*/
if (e->delta)
write_one(f, e->delta, offset);

e->idx.offset = *offset;
size = write_object(f, e, *offset);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -501,11 +505,9 @@ static void write_pack_file(void)
sha1write(f, &hdr, sizeof(hdr));
offset = sizeof(hdr);
nr_written = 0;
for (; i < nr_objects; i++) {
if (!write_one(f, objects + i, &offset))
break;
display_progress(progress_state, written);
}
for (i = 0; i < nr_objects; i++)
if (write_one(f, objects + i, &offset) == 1)
display_progress(progress_state, written);

/*
* Did we write the wrong # entries in the header?
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -580,26 +582,13 @@ static void write_pack_file(void)
written_list[j]->offset = (off_t)-1;
}
nr_remaining -= nr_written;
} while (nr_remaining && i < nr_objects);
} while (nr_remaining);

free(written_list);
stop_progress(&progress_state);
if (written != nr_result)
die("wrote %"PRIu32" objects while expecting %"PRIu32,
written, nr_result);
/*
* We have scanned through [0 ... i). Since we have written
* the correct number of objects, the remaining [i ... nr_objects)
* items must be either already written (due to out-of-order delta base)
* or a preferred base. Count those which are neither and complain if any.
*/
for (j = 0; i < nr_objects; i++) {
struct object_entry *e = objects + i;
j += !e->idx.offset && !e->preferred_base;
}
if (j)
die("wrote %"PRIu32" objects as expected but %"PRIu32
" unwritten", written, j);
}

static int locate_object_entry_hash(const unsigned char *sha1)
Expand Down

0 comments on commit a2430dd

Please sign in to comment.