V1.4.1 - #161
Conversation
|
Hi Manisha, Thanks for proposing this pull request. I'll wait for you to add the remainder of the code (e.g. server changes) and to finish the unit tests before I review. Thanks, |
|
Hi James, Thanks for pointing out. I have missed adding the server changes to the PR. Added it now. Please let me know, if anything is needed. |
|
I still don't like the composite class. I think sending the repository name as a the |
|
Hi James, Need a bit of a clarification here. |
|
The fork method UserModel argument should be the UserModel who authenticated for the request. I shouldn't be able to authenticate and create a fork for your account. As for non-admins successfully forking, I'll have to review the security more carefully. |
|
Hi James, |
|
I'll get some variation of this merged for the next major release. I'm looking at around June 1 for release - so, somewhere in the next 30 days. |
|
Ok. Great. |
|
Yes. And I still think there is an issue with non-admins being able to fork. They should be able to, but I haven't tested that with your code. There is a subtle implied permission in the ordering of the requests enum. |
|
This has been revised and merged into develop. |
Please commit this to the main branch. This has the modified RPCUtils implementation for gitblit along with the test.