Feature/i11054 clean submodules

[NatRavenhill]

Fixes #11054

Proposed changes

• Add "Clean submodules recursively" option
• When checked, the command "git submodule foreach --recursive git clean" will be ran after "git clean", with the same arguments

Screenshots

Before

After

Test methodology

• Tested with a couple of local projects
• Added a unit test in the GitCommands unit tests

Test environment(s)

• GIT 2.41.0.windows.1
• Windows 10

Merge strategy

I agree that the maintainer squash merge this PR (if the commit message is clear).

---

✒️ I contribute this code under The Developer Certificate of Origin.

[RussKie]

👍

[gerhardol]

preview is not handled in Preview_Click()
I suggest that is added too

[gerhardol]

@NatRavenhill and @scottsumrall can you agree how to merge the Designer changes?

[scottsumrall]

@NatRavenhill and @scottsumrall can you agree how to merge the Designer changes?

I'm fairly new to this but happy to give it a shot. Would it possibly be easier to just revert my designer and modify based on what @NatRavenhill has? The UI wasn't particularly difficult to implement in the first place. Seems like merging the designer files could be problematic but it's not something I've really messed with before.

[gerhardol]

@NatRavenhill and @scottsumrall can you agree how to merge the Designer changes?

I'm fairly new to this but happy to give it a shot. Would it possibly be easier to just revert my designer and modify based on what @NatRavenhill has? The UI wasn't particularly difficult to implement in the first place. Seems like merging the designer files could be problematic but it's not something I've really messed with before.

The PR that goes second need to rebase on master using the Designer file from master and then manually reapply changes. Not so hard but often feeling like a waste of time. But hard to avoid here.
But if @scottsumrall is OK with it, we can merge this PR first.

[scottsumrall]

@NatRavenhill and @scottsumrall can you agree how to merge the Designer changes?

I'm fairly new to this but happy to give it a shot. Would it possibly be easier to just revert my designer and modify based on what @NatRavenhill has? The UI wasn't particularly difficult to implement in the first place. Seems like merging the designer files could be problematic but it's not something I've really messed with before.

The PR that goes second need to rebase on master using the Designer file from master and then manually reapply changes. Not so hard but often feeling like a waste of time. But hard to avoid here.

But if @scottsumrall is OK with it, we can merge this PR first.

Works for me

[gerhardol]

Pushed a change for ArgumentString as well as for using common code for preview/execute.
Plan to merge tomorrow so #11102 can be rebased and merged.

[RussKie]

Thank you all