New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Push multiple: Set default push to false #8515
Push multiple: Set default push to false #8515
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #8515 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 55.21% 55.19% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 900 900
Lines 64563 64563
Branches 11553 11553
==========================================
- Hits 35646 35638 -8
- Misses 26194 26195 +1
- Partials 2723 2730 +7
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
I have made also something to improve the push multiple selection.
I will create a PR with my changes so that we are able to discuss...
It allows to unselect all, select all or select only tracked remotes.
|
Good, I will close this PR (draft fornow) |
This PR is not incompatible with mine. So you can merge it. |
It should be OK to change the defaults, this is how I expect this to be useful But if someone uses "all set by default" to make a backup or something it is nice if there is a "select all with remote tracking". |
@msftbot merge in 33 hours |
Hello @gerhardol! Because you've given me some instructions on how to help merge this pull request, I'll be modifying my merge approach. Here's how I understand your requirements for merging this pull request:
If this doesn't seem right to you, you can tell me to cancel these instructions and use the auto-merge policy that has been configured for this repository. Try telling me "forget everything I just told you". |
Fixes #4421
Proposed changes
No implementation of ticking multiple branches
Screenshots
Before
After
Test methodology
Manual
✒️ I contribute this code under The Developer Certificate of Origin.