-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 132
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
builtin/commit: replace sequencer_in_use
/rebase_in_progress
combo by an enum
#426
Comments
I'd like to take this on. (and am testing a patch) |
@dscho So I wrote a patch that does this, however the DCO is proving problematic. GitHub is giving me the message saying there is no signoff, but I think it is because my GitHub username is not my full name (Full name is mentioned as the requirement in the SubmittingPatches doc). Should I allow it to use Fmstrat instead of my full name? |
Can you make sure that your |
So now that the PR is approved, out of curiosity (having never contributed to And is this the best place to continue to look for issues I can contribute through? (I wasn't sure if the issue tracker here was the master list) |
That means nothing ;-)
Well, at first you will have to |
This is already addressed in pu by pw/advise-rebase-skip |
@dscho I think this issue can be closed :) |
In 116a408, I introduced the variable
rebase_in_progress
to be able to discern between the situation where agit cherry-pick
operation resulted in an empty patch vs agit rebase
operation.Junio pointed out in
https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqr234i2q0.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/
that these variables should probably be combined into a singleenum
that has three states:While at it, we should probably see whether we need to take care of
git revert
, too: it also could result in an empty patch.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: