Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[GHSA-jcp9-796g-pv9p] Missing Cryptographic Step in OWASP Enterprise Security API for Java #3817

Conversation

MarkLee131
Copy link

Updates

  • References

Comments
Add a patch ESAPI/esapi-java-legacy@41138fe, of which the commit message claims Fix for Google Issue #306 and changes to address the side effects of the fix (i.e., the removal of the deprecated ESAPI 1.4 encrypt() / decrypt() methods from the Encryptor interface).

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the base branch from main to MarkLee131/advisory-improvement-3817 March 3, 2024 17:13
@darakian
Copy link
Contributor

darakian commented Mar 5, 2024

Hey @MarkLee131, not sure I follow on this one. Can you elaborate on how you arrived at this commit?

@MarkLee131
Copy link
Author

@darakian , hi, I wonder what additional information or format you want? :(

it seems the commit msg explicitly claims it fixed the issue 306 ESAPI/esapi-java-legacy#306. the issue is also shown in the current reference link pointing to this CVE.

@darakian
Copy link
Contributor

So it does. Thanks and sorry for missing that.

@advisory-database advisory-database bot merged commit b3404df into MarkLee131/advisory-improvement-3817 Mar 20, 2024
2 checks passed
@advisory-database advisory-database bot deleted the MarkLee131-GHSA-jcp9-796g-pv9p branch March 20, 2024 17:42
@advisory-database
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @MarkLee131! Thank you so much for contributing to the GitHub Advisory Database. This database is free, open, and accessible to all, and it's people like you who make it great. Thanks for choosing to help others. We hope you send in more contributions in the future!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants