Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add note on versioning approach to changelog #2044

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 18, 2023

Conversation

nickfyson
Copy link
Contributor

@nickfyson nickfyson commented Dec 18, 2023

This PR adds a short explanation of our approach to version numbering at the top of the changelog.

It also ensures any change to the opening text is handled in the mergeback scripting, by anchoring the insertion of the new section to the existing ## heading rather than the previous hardcoded line number.

Merge / deployment checklist

  • Confirm this change is backwards compatible with existing workflows.
  • Confirm the readme has been updated if necessary.
  • Confirm the changelog has been updated if necessary.

@nickfyson nickfyson requested a review from a team as a code owner December 18, 2023 13:45
CHANGELOG.md Outdated
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@

See the [releases page](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases) for the relevant changes to the CodeQL CLI and language packs.

Note that for the CodeQL Action we use the major version number to mark a change in the node version used, while the minor & patch numbers indicate releases that support the same features across node versions. For example `3.22.11` is the first `v3` release and is functionally identical to `2.22.11`, which was released while we continue to support `v2`. This approach ensures an easy way to track exactly which features are included in different versions.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you mention that there is feature parity between v2 and v3? They only difference is that v2 runs on node 16 and v3 node 20. This is implied, but not stated outright.

Also, this paragraph implies that the only reason we bump major versions is to support a new node version. That happens to be the case for the last two major releases, but may not be so in the future. Maybe you can change the note to

Note that the only difference between v2 and v3 of the CodeQL Action is the node version they support...

(Or something like that.)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've pushed another commit, which may or may not reflect an improvement in clarity... 😅

CHANGELOG.md Outdated
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@

See the [releases page](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases) for the relevant changes to the CodeQL CLI and language packs.

Note that for the CodeQL Action we use the major version number to mark a change in the node version used, while the minor & patch numbers indicate releases that support the same features across node versions. For example `3.22.11` is the first `v3` release and is functionally identical to `2.22.11`, which was released while we continue to support `v2`. This approach ensures an easy way to track exactly which features are included in different versions.
Note that the only difference between `v2` and `v3` of the CodeQL Action is the node version they support, with `v3` running on node 20 while we continue to release `v2` to support running on node 16. This approach ensures an easy way to track exactly which features are included in different versions, indicated by the minor and patch version numbers.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, but now it's missing something about 2.x.y and 3.x.y being the same except for node version. It was in the previous attempt and only implied here. 😄

Copy link
Contributor Author

@nickfyson nickfyson Dec 18, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have pushed another commit. Review comments containing suggested changes are more than welcome if I'm still not hitting the mark! 😆

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry...reviewing on my phone (power outage), so crafting precise changes it hard.

Copy link
Contributor

@aeisenberg aeisenberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@nickfyson nickfyson merged commit 7e187e1 into main Dec 18, 2023
339 checks passed
@nickfyson nickfyson deleted the nickfyson/update-changelog branch December 18, 2023 22:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants