Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2.15.1 mergeback #286

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Mar 31, 2023
Merged

2.15.1 mergeback #286

merged 13 commits into from
Mar 31, 2023

Conversation

jsinglet
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Mergeback to main.

Change request type

  • Release or process automation (GitHub workflows, internal scripts)
  • Internal documentation
  • External documentation
  • Query files (.ql, .qll, .qls or unit tests)
  • External scripts (analysis report or other code shipped as part of a release)

Rules with added or modified queries

  • No rules added
  • Queries have been added for the following rules:
    • rule number here
  • Queries have been modified for the following rules:
    • rule number here

Release change checklist

A change note (development_handbook.md#change-notes) is required for any pull request which modifies:

  • The structure or layout of the release artifacts.
  • The evaluation performance (memory, execution time) of an existing query.
  • The results of an existing query in any circumstance.

If you are only adding new rule queries, a change note is not required.

Author: Is a change note required?

  • Yes
  • No

馃毃馃毃馃毃
Reviewer: Confirm that format of shared queries (not the .qll file, the
.ql file that imports it) is valid by running them within VS Code.

  • Confirmed

Reviewer: Confirm that either a change note is not required or the change note is required and has been added.

  • Confirmed

Query development review checklist

For PRs that add new queries or modify existing queries, the following checklist should be completed by both the author and reviewer:

Author

  • Have all the relevant rule package description files been checked in?
  • Have you verified that the metadata properties of each new query is set appropriately?
  • Do all the unit tests contain both "COMPLIANT" and "NON_COMPLIANT" cases?
  • Are the alert messages properly formatted and consistent with the style guide?
  • Have you run the queries on OpenPilot and verified that the performance and results are acceptable?
    As a rule of thumb, predicates specific to the query should take no more than 1 minute, and for simple queries be under 10 seconds. If this is not the case, this should be highlighted and agreed in the code review process.
  • Does the query have an appropriate level of in-query comments/documentation?
  • Have you considered/identified possible edge cases?
  • Does the query not reinvent features in the standard library?
  • Can the query be simplified further (not golfed!)

Reviewer

  • Have all the relevant rule package description files been checked in?
  • Have you verified that the metadata properties of each new query is set appropriately?
  • Do all the unit tests contain both "COMPLIANT" and "NON_COMPLIANT" cases?
  • Are the alert messages properly formatted and consistent with the style guide?
  • Have you run the queries on OpenPilot and verified that the performance and results are acceptable?
    As a rule of thumb, predicates specific to the query should take no more than 1 minute, and for simple queries be under 10 seconds. If this is not the case, this should be highlighted and agreed in the code review process.
  • Does the query have an appropriate level of in-query comments/documentation?
  • Have you considered/identified possible edge cases?
  • Does the query not reinvent features in the standard library?
  • Can the query be simplified further (not golfed!)

jsinglet and others added 11 commits March 14, 2023 19:15
Release Engineering: Version bump to 2.15.0.
The calculatons for signed and unsigned type of lowest rank were
expensive when there were a large number of constant expressions in the
program. This commit improves performance by:
 1. Creating classes to represent the set of integer constant
expressions and integer constants in the program.
 2. Creating a candidate table of IntegralTypes for each known constant
integer value in the program, to avoid duplicate work.
 3. Calculating the stlr and utlr for each constant value, not each
constant expression.
This improves the performance of Rule 10.5 by computing all the types of
the cast first, before determining whether they were invalid. Previously
the join orderer found the essential type category of the "from" type,
then joined that will invalid type categories, then joined that with all
expressions of that type before filtering down to the cast.
# Conflicts:
#	c/cert/src/qlpack.yml
#	c/cert/test/qlpack.yml
#	c/common/src/qlpack.yml
#	c/common/test/qlpack.yml
#	c/misra/src/qlpack.yml
#	c/misra/test/qlpack.yml
#	cpp/autosar/src/qlpack.yml
#	cpp/autosar/test/qlpack.yml
#	cpp/cert/src/qlpack.yml
#	cpp/cert/test/qlpack.yml
#	cpp/common/src/qlpack.yml
#	cpp/common/test/qlpack.yml
#	cpp/misra/src/qlpack.yml
#	cpp/misra/test/qlpack.yml
#	cpp/report/src/qlpack.yml
#	docs/user_manual.md
@jsinglet jsinglet enabled auto-merge March 30, 2023 22:27
@jsinglet jsinglet added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 30, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit 015fc83 Mar 31, 2023
@jsinglet jsinglet deleted the 2.15.1-mergeback branch March 31, 2023 00:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants