Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add --include-from option to GitHub forecast #220

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 27, 2023

Conversation

Chaseshak
Copy link
Contributor

@Chaseshak Chaseshak commented Jul 26, 2023

What's changing?

  • Add the --include-from option to support splitting GitHub forecasts across multiple machines/CLI invocations.

How's this tested?

  • Run dotnet run --project src/ActionsImporter/ActionsImporter.csproj -- forecast github --help and see that the new --include-from option is included and matches the one in github/valet#6672

Closes github/valet#6618

@github-actions
Copy link

Unit Test Results

41 tests  ±0   41 ✔️ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
  1 suites ±0     0 💤 ±0 
  1 files   ±0     0 ±0 

Results for commit 654caf8. ± Comparison against base commit 93163ee.

@Chaseshak Chaseshak marked this pull request as ready for review July 26, 2023 21:48
@Chaseshak Chaseshak requested a review from a team as a code owner July 26, 2023 21:48
Copy link
Contributor

@luke-engle luke-engle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚢

@ethanis ethanis merged commit 4f62f5f into main Jul 27, 2023
5 checks passed
@ethanis ethanis deleted the add-include-from-option-to-GH-forecast branch July 27, 2023 00:48
Kimmie234 added a commit to Kimmie234/gh-actions-importer that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2023
Copy link

@jonesk7734 jonesk7734 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😃

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
4 participants