Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "(Partially) revert #6148" #6181

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 15, 2021
Merged

Conversation

csweichel
Copy link
Contributor

@csweichel csweichel commented Oct 12, 2021

Reverts #6170

The original partial revert is without consequence as gRPC has a minimum of 10 seconds here.
The actual fix for the underlying issue is #6166

NONE

@csweichel
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold until #6166 is merged

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 12, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #6181 (a0a3efc) into main (7dfe6e2) will increase coverage by 15.02%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6181       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   19.04%   34.07%   +15.02%     
===========================================
  Files           2      128      +126     
  Lines         168    22172    +22004     
===========================================
+ Hits           32     7554     +7522     
- Misses        134    13934    +13800     
- Partials        2      684      +682     
Flag Coverage Δ
components-blobserve-app 31.34% <ø> (?)
components-blobserve-lib 31.34% <ø> (?)
components-common-go-lib 36.89% <ø> (?)
components-content-service-api-go-lib ∅ <ø> (?)
components-content-service-app 14.48% <ø> (?)
components-content-service-lib 14.48% <ø> (?)
components-ee-agent-smith-app 34.10% <ø> (?)
components-ee-agent-smith-lib 34.10% <ø> (?)
components-ee-kedge-app 45.48% <ø> (?)
components-ee-ws-scheduler-app 63.89% <ø> (?)
components-ee-ws-scheduler-lib 63.89% <ø> (?)
components-image-builder-api-go-lib ∅ <ø> (?)
components-image-builder-app 34.44% <ø> (?)
components-image-builder-bob-app ∅ <ø> (?)
components-image-builder-mk3-app 34.76% <ø> (?)
components-local-app-app-linux-amd64 ?
components-local-app-app-linux-arm64 ?
components-local-app-app-windows-386 ?
components-local-app-app-windows-amd64 ?
components-local-app-app-windows-arm64 ?
components-openvsx-proxy-app 46.22% <ø> (?)
components-registry-facade-app 11.85% <ø> (?)
components-registry-facade-lib 11.85% <ø> (?)
components-service-waiter-app ∅ <ø> (?)
components-supervisor-app 38.69% <ø> (?)
components-workspacekit-app 7.09% <ø> (?)
components-ws-daemon-api-go-lib ∅ <ø> (?)
components-ws-daemon-app 22.11% <ø> (?)
components-ws-daemon-lib 22.11% <ø> (?)
components-ws-daemon-nsinsider-app ∅ <ø> (?)
components-ws-manager-api-go-lib ∅ <ø> (?)
components-ws-manager-app 39.37% <ø> (?)
components-ws-proxy-app 69.53% <ø> (?)
components-ws-proxy-lib 69.53% <ø> (?)
dev-loadgen-app ∅ <ø> (?)
dev-poolkeeper-app ∅ <ø> (?)
installer-app 6.08% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
components/local-app/pkg/auth/auth.go
components/local-app/pkg/auth/pkce.go
...onents/content-service/pkg/initializer/download.go 76.31% <0.00%> (ø)
...nts/content-service/pkg/initializer/initializer.go 5.14% <0.00%> (ø)
components/ee/agent-smith/pkg/agent/egress.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
components/workspacekit/cmd/rings.go 6.97% <0.00%> (ø)
...onents/ws-daemon/pkg/internal/session/workspace.go 50.73% <0.00%> (ø)
components/ws-proxy/pkg/proxy/pass.go 74.40% <0.00%> (ø)
components/supervisor/pkg/terminal/ring-buffer.go 45.65% <0.00%> (ø)
...onents/content-service/pkg/initializer/prebuild.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 120 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7dfe6e2...a0a3efc. Read the comment docs.

@geropl
Copy link
Member

geropl commented Oct 13, 2021

Please, before we do this right away: have a look at https://console.cloud.google.com/errors/CISRmNnx2fnk5wE?time=P7D&project=gitpod-staging

Not saying #6170 is particularly good solution (was meant as a temporary measure after all), and sorry if I did not communicate well here. But let's find out what went wrong and how to mitigate! 🏀

@geropl
Copy link
Member

geropl commented Oct 13, 2021

Ah, just found #6166 Nice that you found out, why not have both in one PR for context?

@csweichel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah, just found #6166 Nice that you found out, why not have both in one PR for context?

#6166 came before the partial revert and this revert of the partial revert :)

@csweichel
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Oct 15, 2021

/werft run

👍 started the job as gitpod-build-revert-6170-gpl-revert-6148.1

@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Oct 15, 2021

/lgtm
/approve no-issue

@roboquat
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: ad3eeb776075a9aa40a56bbb366b5bce6928ea0f

@roboquat
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: aledbf

Associated issue: #6170

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@roboquat roboquat merged commit cba8f42 into main Oct 15, 2021
@roboquat roboquat deleted the revert-6170-gpl/revert-6148 branch October 15, 2021 12:15
@roboquat roboquat added deployed: workspace Workspace team change is running in production deployed Change is completely running in production labels Oct 31, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved deployed: workspace Workspace team change is running in production deployed Change is completely running in production release-note size/XS team: workspace Issue belongs to the Workspace team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants