Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

python 3 compatibility #45

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 19, 2015 · 6 comments
Open

python 3 compatibility #45

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 19, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

It would be great to have a python 3 compatible version of pymox.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by lamvak on 28 Mar 2012 at 6:45

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I'm trying to port mox to Python 3.3. I't almost completed now. Here is my 
code: https://github.com/e0ne/pymox/tree/python3.
Any questions, comments, or patches are welcome.

I hope, it will be useful for somebody else.

Original comment by e...@e0ne.info on 19 Apr 2013 at 3:29

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Please please please this would be great to make it easier for projects that 
depends on mox to port to python3.

Original comment by zul...@gmail.com on 30 Apr 2013 at 7:00

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

This is crucial for pymox as more and more projects move to full python3 
compatibility.

For now, I'll contribute to the attempted port on github, but please make this 
a priority or I would have to stop using and advocating use of pymox over other 
mock frameworks.

Original comment by lavage...@gmail.com on 24 Nov 2013 at 8:13

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I'm currently in Tokyo for work.  I'll look into what it'll take to get a 
"blessed" port in here when I'm back in the US.

Original comment by steve.mi...@gmail.com on 27 Nov 2013 at 9:08

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

It could be worth to try 2to3, but I'm guessing it won't work to good with 
hackety-hack required by pymox.

Original comment by lamvak on 27 Nov 2013 at 9:09

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I already tried 2to3 of course, and no, it requires some more work. I'll wait 
for you to get back from your work trip - I'm anyway available to help with 
porting if needed.

Many thanks :)

G.

Original comment by lavage...@gmail.com on 27 Nov 2013 at 9:19

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant