Minor licensing inconsistency

[kentfredric]

File	Indicated License
LICENSE	GPL-3
lib/Archive/Tar/Wrapper.pm	GPL-3+
Makefile.PL	GPL-3
eg/tarflat	perl
META.yml	gpl
README.md	GPL-3+
META.json	GPL-3

The biggest outlier here being eg/tarflat

archive-tar-wrapper-perl/eg/tarflat

Lines 89 to 98 in e93747f

	=head1 LEGALESE
	Copyright 2005 by Mike Schilli,
	all rights reserved. This program is free
	software, you can redistribute it and/or
	modify it under the same terms as Perl itself.
	=head1 AUTHOR
	2005, Mike Schilli <cpan@perlmeister.com>

It may not be legally viable to fix this or whatever, but I thought I'd just raise this in case the situation can be improved.

[glasswalk3r]

Thank you for reporting this issue!

Please see this branch, that should fix the licenses.

Regarding META.yml showing gpl instead of GPL-3, it seems there is nothing I can do about it since META.yml uses an old specification, even though I specifying the expected GPL-3 value. See here for more details.

[kentfredric]

Yeah, the thing with META.yml is somewhat expected, but was mostly presented as evidence that "perl" is the outlier.

[glasswalk3r]

I understand. I missed that script, but now should be fixed.
Could you please take a shot and see if now it's fixed? Pretty simple, but a fresh pair of eyes always get extra things. 😃

[kentfredric]

Yeah, seems better now. 👍

I have a tiny little script that just does some pretty crude grepping of certain keywords that I've been pointing at every CPAN dist I vendorize, and its crudeness makes it very sensitive at detecting obscure outliers ^_^

[glasswalk3r]

Hi there,

Just release version 0.38 that fixes those license issues.

Regarding this script of yours, I suggest you to take it to the CPAN testers.

A while ago I suggested that our smoker execute some "basic" tests (not distribution dependent) automatically, I guess this script of your would be a strong candidate for that.

You can reach the CPAN testers mailing list here: https://lists.perl.org/list/cpan-testers-discuss.html.

For now I'm closing this issue. Thanks again!