Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #391 from glimmerjs/bugfix-signature-master
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Fix Signature handling for unions and generics
  • Loading branch information
chadhietala committed Apr 1, 2022
2 parents 66298e1 + 006323e commit 8edbbb8
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 74 additions and 33 deletions.
31 changes: 19 additions & 12 deletions packages/@glimmer/component/addon/-private/component.ts
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -60,18 +60,7 @@ type ArgsFor<S> = 'Args' extends keyof S
: { Named: S['Args']; Positional: [] }
: { Named: EmptyObject; Positional: [] };

/**
* Given any allowed shorthand form of a signature, desugars it to its full
* expanded type.
*
* @internal This is only exported so we can avoid duplicating it in
* [Glint](https://github.com/typed-ember/glint) or other such tooling. It is
* *not* intended for public usage, and the specific mechanics it uses may
* change at any time. Although the signature produced by is part of Glimmer's
* public API the existence and mechanics of this specific symbol are *not*,
* so ***DO NOT RELY ON IT***.
*/
export type ExpandSignature<T> = {
type _ExpandSignature<T> = {
Element: GetOrElse<T, 'Element', null>;
Args: keyof T extends 'Args' | 'Element' | 'Blocks' // Is this a `Signature`?
? ArgsFor<T> // Then use `Signature` args
Expand All @@ -84,6 +73,24 @@ export type ExpandSignature<T> = {
}
: EmptyObject;
};
/**
* Given any allowed shorthand form of a signature, desugars it to its full
* expanded type.
*
* @internal This is only exported so we can avoid duplicating it in
* [Glint](https://github.com/typed-ember/glint) or other such tooling. It is
* *not* intended for public usage, and the specific mechanics it uses may
* change at any time. Although the signature produced by is part of Glimmer's
* public API the existence and mechanics of this specific symbol are *not*,
* so ***DO NOT RELY ON IT***.
*/
// The conditional type here is because TS applies conditional types
// distributively. This means that for union types, checks like `keyof T` get
// all the keys from all elements of the union, instead of ending up as `never`
// and then always falling into the `Signature` path instead of falling back to
// the legacy args handling path.
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
export type ExpandSignature<T> = T extends any ? _ExpandSignature<T> : never;

/**
* @internal we use this type for convenience internally; inference means users
Expand Down
76 changes: 55 additions & 21 deletions test/types/component-test.ts
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,37 +1,71 @@
import { expectTypeOf } from 'expect-type';

// Intentionally checking the shape of the exports *and* the export itself.
import * as gc from '@glimmer/component';
// tslint:disable-next-line: no-duplicate-imports
import Component from '@glimmer/component';

// Imported from non-public-API so we can check that we are publishing what we
// expect to be -- and this keeps us honest about the fact that if we *change*
// this import location, we've broken any existing declarations published using
// the current type signatures.
import { EmptyObject } from '@glimmer/component/addon/-private/component';

const Component = gc.default;
declare let basicComponent: Component;
expectTypeOf(basicComponent).toHaveProperty('args');
expectTypeOf(basicComponent).toHaveProperty('isDestroying');
expectTypeOf(basicComponent).toHaveProperty('isDestroyed');
expectTypeOf(basicComponent).toHaveProperty('willDestroy');
expectTypeOf(basicComponent.isDestroying).toEqualTypeOf<boolean>();
expectTypeOf(basicComponent.isDestroyed).toEqualTypeOf<boolean>();
expectTypeOf(basicComponent.willDestroy).toEqualTypeOf<() => void>();

expectTypeOf(gc).toHaveProperty('default');
expectTypeOf(gc.default).toEqualTypeOf<typeof Component>();

type Args = {
type LegacyArgs = {
foo: number;
};

const componentWithLegacyArgs = new Component<Args>({}, { foo: 123 });
expectTypeOf(componentWithLegacyArgs).toHaveProperty('args');
expectTypeOf(componentWithLegacyArgs).toHaveProperty('isDestroying');
expectTypeOf(componentWithLegacyArgs).toHaveProperty('isDestroyed');
expectTypeOf(componentWithLegacyArgs).toHaveProperty('willDestroy');
expectTypeOf(componentWithLegacyArgs.args).toEqualTypeOf<Readonly<Args>>();
expectTypeOf(componentWithLegacyArgs.isDestroying).toEqualTypeOf<boolean>();
expectTypeOf(componentWithLegacyArgs.isDestroyed).toEqualTypeOf<boolean>();
expectTypeOf(componentWithLegacyArgs.willDestroy).toEqualTypeOf<() => void>();
const componentWithLegacyArgs = new Component<LegacyArgs>({}, { foo: 123 });
expectTypeOf(componentWithLegacyArgs.args).toEqualTypeOf<Readonly<LegacyArgs>>();

// Here, we are testing that the types propertly distribute over union types,
// generics which extend other types, etc.
// Here, we are testing that the types propertly distribute over union types,
// generics which extend other types, etc.
type LegacyArgsDistributive = { foo: number } | { bar: string; baz: boolean };

const legacyArgsDistributiveA = new Component<LegacyArgsDistributive>({}, { foo: 123 });
expectTypeOf(legacyArgsDistributiveA.args).toEqualTypeOf<Readonly<LegacyArgsDistributive>>();
const legacyArgsDistributiveB = new Component<LegacyArgsDistributive>(
{},
{ bar: 'hello', baz: true }
);
expectTypeOf(legacyArgsDistributiveB.args).toEqualTypeOf<Readonly<LegacyArgsDistributive>>();

interface ExtensibleLegacy<T> {
value: T;
extras: boolean;
funThings: string[];
}

class WithExtensibleLegacy<T extends ExtensibleLegacy<unknown>> extends Component<T> {}
declare const withExtensibleLegacy: WithExtensibleLegacy<ExtensibleLegacy<unknown>>;
expectTypeOf(withExtensibleLegacy.args.value).toEqualTypeOf<unknown>();
expectTypeOf(withExtensibleLegacy.args.extras).toEqualTypeOf<boolean>();
expectTypeOf(withExtensibleLegacy.args.funThings).toEqualTypeOf<string[]>();

class WithExtensibleLegacySubclass extends WithExtensibleLegacy<ExtensibleLegacy<string>> {}
declare const withExtensibleLegacySubclass: WithExtensibleLegacySubclass;
expectTypeOf(withExtensibleLegacySubclass.args.value).toEqualTypeOf<string>();

interface ArgsOnly {
Args: Args;
Args: LegacyArgs;
}

const componentWithArgsOnly = new Component<ArgsOnly>({}, { foo: 123 });
expectTypeOf(componentWithArgsOnly.args).toEqualTypeOf<Readonly<Args>>();
expectTypeOf(componentWithArgsOnly.args).toEqualTypeOf<Readonly<LegacyArgs>>();

interface ElementOnly {
Element: HTMLParagraphElement;
Expand All @@ -55,33 +89,33 @@ const componentWithBlockOnly = new Component<BlockOnlySig>({}, {});
expectTypeOf(componentWithBlockOnly.args).toEqualTypeOf<Readonly<EmptyObject>>();

interface ArgsAndBlocks {
Args: Args;
Args: LegacyArgs;
Blocks: Blocks;
}

const componentwithArgsAndBlocks = new Component<ArgsAndBlocks>({}, { foo: 123 });
expectTypeOf(componentwithArgsAndBlocks.args).toEqualTypeOf<Readonly<Args>>();
expectTypeOf(componentwithArgsAndBlocks.args).toEqualTypeOf<Readonly<LegacyArgs>>();

interface ArgsAndEl {
Args: Args;
Args: LegacyArgs;
Element: HTMLParagraphElement;
}

const componentwithArgsAndEl = new Component<ArgsAndEl>({}, { foo: 123 });
expectTypeOf(componentwithArgsAndEl.args).toEqualTypeOf<Readonly<Args>>();
expectTypeOf(componentwithArgsAndEl.args).toEqualTypeOf<Readonly<LegacyArgs>>();

interface FullShortSig {
Args: Args;
Args: LegacyArgs;
Element: HTMLParagraphElement;
Blocks: Blocks;
}

const componentWithFullShortSig = new Component<FullShortSig>({}, { foo: 123 });
expectTypeOf(componentWithFullShortSig.args).toEqualTypeOf<Readonly<Args>>();
expectTypeOf(componentWithFullShortSig.args).toEqualTypeOf<Readonly<LegacyArgs>>();

interface FullLongSig {
Args: {
Named: Args;
Named: LegacyArgs;
Positional: [];
};
Element: HTMLParagraphElement;
Expand All @@ -95,4 +129,4 @@ interface FullLongSig {
}

const componentWithFullSig = new Component<FullLongSig>({}, { foo: 123 });
expectTypeOf(componentWithFullSig.args).toEqualTypeOf<Readonly<Args>>();
expectTypeOf(componentWithFullSig.args).toEqualTypeOf<Readonly<LegacyArgs>>();

0 comments on commit 8edbbb8

Please sign in to comment.